Viabilização do processo de compostagem na URI/Santo Ângelo-RS, para a produção de plântulas na educação ambiental da ONG Eco Global Missões
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818731Palavras-chave:
Compostagem, Sementes, Educação ambientalResumo
O trabalho objetivou viabilizar o processo de compostagem com as folhas recolhidas no Campus da URI/Santo Ângelo-RS, com o plantio das sementes coletadas para as atividades em Educação Ambiental. O desenvolvimento prático foi realizado na área do Campus com os alunos do Ensino Fundamental da Escola Municipal Dr. Orlando Sparta de Souza em parceria com a ONG Eco-Global Missões. Os materiais orgânicos utilizados na composteira são passíveis de decomposição juntamente com a implantação das minhocas Eisenia andrei, conforme parâmetros físicos e químicos exigidos para as reações. O chorume formado é um biofertilizante utilizado na proporção 1:10L. O húmus, após trinta dias, foi misturado na proporção de 1:10 com o solo lato-solo de Santo Ângelo no preparo do substrato que foi acondicionado em garrafas PET transparentes (2L), onde as sementes foram semeadas pelos alunos envolvidos. A semeadura das espécies vegetais proporcionou a produção de plântulas, as quais foram plantadas em local definitivo na comunidade que envolve a escola. A interação entre a universidade e a comunidade é fundamental para que a Educação Ambiental resgate valores pessoais e, também, promova o bem estar socioambiental. Torna-se uma alternativa sustentável na recuperação de áreas degradadas e recomposição de matas ciliares.
Downloads
Referências
ODUM, E. Ecologia. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Kogan, 1983.
KIEHL, E.J. Manual de Compostagem: maturação e qualidade do composto. Piracicaba: E.J. Kiehl. 1998. 180p.
HU, D. et al. A pilot ecological engineering project for municipal solid waste reduction, disinfection, regeneration and industrialization in Guanghan City, China. Ecol. Eng., Oxford, v. 11, p. 129–138, 1998.
MIYASHITA, C.M. et al. Compostagem e sua aplicação.
EL FADEL, M.; DOUSEID, E.; CHAHINE, W.; ALAYLIC, B. Factors influencing solid waste generation and management. Waste Management. V. 22, p. 269 - 276, 2002.
KJELDSEN, P.; BARLAZ, M. A.; ROOKER, A. P.; BAUN, A.; LEDIN, A.; CHRISTENSEN, T. Present and Long-Term Composition of MSW Landfill Leachate: A Review. Environmental Science and Technology. V. 32, (4), p. 297 - 336, 2002.
PEREIRA NETO, J.T. On the treatment of municipal refuse and sewage sludge using aerated staticpile composting – a low cost technology approach. Department of Civil Engineering, 1987. 292p.Dissertação (Doctor of Philosophy) The University of Leeds England.
LORENZI, HARRI; Árvores brasileiras volume III. Manual de Identificação e Cultivo de Plantas Arbóreas Nativas do Brasil. 1. Ed. Instituto Plantarum , 2009.
BACKES Paulo; IRGANG Bruno; Árvores do Sul. Guia de Identificação e Interesse Ecológico. As principais espécies nativas sul-brasileiras. 2. Ed. Paisagismo do Sul, 2002.
BACKES Paulo; IRGANG Bruno; Mata Atlântica: As Árvores e a Paisagem. Porto Alegre: Paisagem do Sul, 2004.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
