Philosophy and science teaching: a strange silence

Authors

  • Caio Seiji Nagayoshi Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo
  • Daniela Lopes Scarpa Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2448065730757

Keywords:

Philosophy teaching, Science Nature, Science Philosophy, Science Teaching

Abstract

In the field of philosohy teaching, few texts have been published focusing the teaching of philosophy of science. However, in the field of science teaching, there is wide recognition that the introduction of elements of philosophy of science in school can contribute to scientific literacy. The argument is that it is not enough for students to learn scientific concepts; they must also learn about scientific activity and the scientific knowledge produced by it, that is, about the nature of science (NOS). The present article presents a brief overview of the research on the topic in the field of science teaching. It is argued that, despite the current lack of communication between the fields of philosophy and science teaching, a greater dialogue between them would be beneficial for both.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Caio Seiji Nagayoshi, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo

Doutorando na Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo

Daniela Lopes Scarpa, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo

Professora na Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo

References

ALLCHIN, D. Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, v. 95, n. 3, p. 518–542, 2011. 26 Refilo – Revista Digital de Ensino de Filosofia | periodicos.ufsm.br/refilo | vol.4 n.1 – jan./jun. 2018

ALLCHIN, D. Teaching the Nature of Science: Perspectives & Resources. Saint Paul: SHiPS Education Press, 2013.

AZEVEDO, N. H.; SCARPA, D. L. Revisão Sistemática de Trabalhos sobre Concepções de Natureza da Ciência no Ensino de Ciências. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, v. 17, n. 2, p. 579–619, 2017.

DAGHER, Z. R.; ERDURAN, S. Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education. Science & Education, v. 25, n. 1–2, p. 147–164, 2016.

DUSCHL, R. A.; GRANDY, R. Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science. Science & Education, v. 22, n. 9, p. 2109–2139, 2013.

HODSON, D. Teaching and Learning about Science - Language, Theories, Methods, History, Traditions and Values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2009.

HODSON, D. Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum: Origin, Development, Implications and Shifting Emphases. In: MATTHEWS, M. R. (Ed.). International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Dordrecht:

Springer, 2014. p. 911–970.

IRZIK, G.; NOLA, R. A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education. Science and Education, v. 20, n. 7, p. 591–607, 2011.

JENKINS, E. W. The “nature of science” in the school curriculum: the great survivor. Journal of Curriculum Studies, v. 45, n. 2, p. 132–151, 2013.

KAMPOURAKIS, K. The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 53, n. 5, p. 667–682, 2016.

KÖTTER, M.; HAMMANN, M. Controversy as a Blind Spot in Teaching Nature of Science - Why the Range of Different Positions Concerning Nature of Science Should Be an Issue in the Science Classroom. Science & Education, v. 26, n. 5, p. 451–482,

LEDERMAN, N. Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of research in science teaching, v. 29, n. 4, p. 331–359, 1992.

LEDERMAN, N. G. et al. Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 39, n. 6, p. 497–521, 2002.

LEDERMAN, N. G. Nature of Science: Past, Present and future. In: ABELL, S. K.; LEDERMAN, N. G. (Eds.). Handbook Of Research On Science Education. New York and London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2007. p. 831–879.

LEDERMAN, N. G.; BARTOS, S. A.; LEDERMAN, J. S. The Development, Use, and 27 Refilo – Revista Digital de Ensino de Filosofia | periodicos.ufsm.br/refilo | vol.4 n.1 – jan./jun. 2018

Interpretation of Nature of Science Assessments. In: MATTHEWS, M. R. (Ed.). International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. p. 971–997.

MATTHEWS, M. R. Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York and London: Routledge, 1994.

MATTHEWS, M. R. Thomas Kuhn’s Impact on Science Education: What Lessons Can Be Learned? Science Education, v. 88, n. 1, p. 90–118, 2004.

MATTHEWS, M. R. Changing the Focus: From Nature of Science (NOS) to Features of Science (FOS). In: KHINE, M. S. (Ed.). Advances in Nature of Science Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. p. 3–26.

MATTHEWS, M. R. (ED.). International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.

MATTHEWS, M. R. Science Teaching The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science 20th Anniversary Revised and Expanded Edition. 2nd. ed. New York: Routledge, 2015.

OLIVEIRA, T. L. T. O Ensino de Filosofia Pensado à Luz de Algumas Questões da Filosofia da Ciência. Revista Digital de Ensino de Filosofia, v. 3, n. 1, p. 91–106, 2017.

PLASTINO, C. E. O ensino de filosofia das ciências naturais no secundário. In: NETO, H. N. (Ed.). O Ensino da Filosofia no Segundo Grau. São Paulo: SEAF/ Sofia, 1986.

SASSERON, L. H.; CARVALHO, A. M. P. DE. Alfabetização científica: uma revisão bibliográfica. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, v. 16, n. 1, p. 59–77, 2011.

UNESCO. Philosophy A School of Freedom. Paris: [s.n.].

UNESCO. Teaching Philosophy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Paris: UNESCO, 2009.

UNESCO. Teaching Philosophy in Europe and North America. Paris: UNESCO, 2011.

Published

2018-08-17

How to Cite

Nagayoshi, C. S., & Scarpa, D. L. (2018). Philosophy and science teaching: a strange silence. Revista Digital De Ensino De Filosofia - REFilo, 4(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.5902/2448065730757

Issue

Section

Artigos – Demanda contínua