Leadership and job performance: relationships with autonomy, intrinsic motivation and engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465990595Schlagworte:
Engaging leadership, Motivation, Work engagement, PerformanceAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the relationship between engaging leadership and job performance through a mediation and moderation model, incorporating engagement as a mediator and intrinsic motivation and autonomy as moderators.
Design/Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 425 workers from various economic sectors, predominantly consisting of women (53.6%), individuals with a college degree (64%), and private-sector employees (61.6%), with a mean age of 36.7 years (SD = 10.7) The participants completed the Engaging Leadership, Engagement, Autonomy, Intrinsic Motivation, and Job Performance Scales.
Findings: Engagement mediates the relationship between engaging leadership and performance, while autonomy moderates the relationship between engagement and job performance.
Originality: Our findings suggest that engagement precedes improvements in job performance, and that workers with high autonomy levels rely less on engagement to achieve high performance. Practically, this study highlights the importance of leaders fostering a healthy organizational environment through practices encouraging communication, mutual support, and continuous encouragement between leaders and employees. This approach signifies a contemporary and innovative leadership style, emphasizing the satisfaction of workers’ basic psychological needs as central to achieving organizational goals effectively and sustainably.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Abualoush, S., Masa’deh, R., Bataineh, K., & Alrowwad, A. (2018). The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 279–309. https://doi.org/10.28945/4088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/4088
Andrade, E. G. S. A., & Valentini, F. (2020). Suporte à aprendizagem e desempenho no trabalho: Modelo de mediação moderada. Estudos de Psicologia, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20200005
Andrade, E. G. S. A., Queiroga, F., & Valentini, F. (2020). Short version of self-assessment scale of job performance. Anales de Psicología, 36(3), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.402661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.402661
Bakker, A. B. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.002
Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604
Cardoso, M. B. M. (2021). Relação entre autonomia no trabalho e satisfação com os papéis de vida: Estudo com uma amostra em teletrabalho e trabalho misto [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon]. UL Campus Repository. https://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/56451
Chen, T., Hao, S., Ding, K., Feng, X., Li, G., & Liang, X. (2020). The impact of organizational support on employee performance. Employee Relations, 42(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0079
Costa, B. R. L. (2018). Bola de neve virtual: O uso das redes sociais virtuais no processo de coleta de dados de uma pesquisa científica. Revista Interdisciplinar de Gestão Social, 7(1), 15–37.
Cunha, L. D. V. (2013). A motivação no trabalho como antecedente da satisfação, do comprometimento e do desempenho: Um estudo em um hospital público [Doctoral dissertation, Federal University of Santa Maria]. UFSM Repository. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/4686
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ”what” and ”why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dewi, P., & Alviani, D. (2023). The role of women’s leadership characteristics in shaping job autonomy and its effects on employee innovation performance. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 14(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v14i2.17648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v14i2.17648
Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_06
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M. H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698
Gans, R. (2024). How motivation type accounts for problematic levels of pro-social engagement across domains of politics, health, and the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 89(1), 180–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2024.2366221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2024.2366221
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Jindal, D., Boxall, P., Cheung, G. W., & Hutchison, A. (2023). How do work engagement and work autonomy affect job crafting and performance? An analysis in an Indian manufacturer. Personnel Review, 52(8), 2008–2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2019-0646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2019-0646
Johannsen, R., & Zak, P. J. (2020). Autonomy raises productivity: An experiment measuring neurophysiology. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00963
Juyumaya, J., Torres-Ochoa, C., & Rojas, G. (2024). Boosting job performance: The impact of autonomy, engagement and age. Revista de Gestão. 31(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-09-2023-0108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-09-2023-0108
Khan, M. T., Ali, S. A., & Rehman, H. U. (2024). How intrinsic motivation augments innovation and commitment? A moderated mediation model of employee’s trust and engagement. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(2), 1188–1201. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i2.2179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i2.2179
Kilroy, S., Fu, N., Bosak, J., Hayes, R., & Schaufeli, W. (2023). Reducing day‐level emotional exhaustion: The complementary role of high involvement work systems and engaging leadership. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(4), 846–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12482
Kuok, A. C. H., & Taormina, R. J. (2017). Work engagement: Evolution of the concept and a new inventory. Psychological Thought, 10(2), 262–287. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i2.236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i2.236
Lee, D. Y., & Jo, Y. (2023). The job demands-resource model and performance: The mediating role of employee engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1194018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1194018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1194018
Mazzetti, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2022). The impact of engaging leadership on employee engagement and team effectiveness: A longitudinal, multi-level study on the mediating role of personal- and team resources. PLoS ONE, 17(6), e0269433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269433
McLachlan, S., & Hagger, M. S. (2011). The influence of chronically accessible autonomous and controlling motives on physical activity within an extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00721.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00721.x
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
Queiroga, F., Borges-Andrade, J. E., & Coelho Junior, F. A. (2015). Desempenho no trabalho: Escala de avaliação geral por meio de autopercepções. In K. Puente-Palacios & A. Peixoto (Eds.), Ferramentas de diagnóstico para organizações e trabalho: Um olhar a partir da psicologia (pp. 36-45). Artmed.
Rahmadani, V. G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2022). Engaging leadership and work engagement as moderated by “diuwongke”: An Indonesian study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(7), 1267-1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1799234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1799234
Rahmadani, V. G., Schaufeli, W. B., Stouten, J., Zhang, Z., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2020). Engaging leadership and its implication for work engagement and job outcomes at the individual and team level: A multi-level longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030776
Rattini, V. (2023). Worker autonomy and performance: Evidence from a real-effort experiment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 32(2), 300-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12511
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-Determination Theory in Human Resource Development: New directions and practical considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318756954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318756954
Robijn, W., Euwema, M. C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Deprez, J. (2020). Leaders, teams and work engagement: A basic needs perspective. Career Development International, 25(4), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-06-2019-0150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-06-2019-0150
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Salas-Vallina, A., Alegre, J., & López-Cabrales, A. (2021). The challenge of increasing employees’ well-being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goal. Human Resource Management, 60(3), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22021
Sandall, H., & Mourão, L. (2023). Desempenho individual no trabalho: Proposições para uma mensuração personalizada e um diagnóstico abrangente. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 24(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg230023.pt DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg230023.pt
Schaufeli, W. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556
Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 20(5), 446-463. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, validity, and reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495
Selander, K., Korkiakangas, E., Toivanen, M., Yli-Kaitala, K., Kangas, H., Nevanperä, N., & Laitinen, J. (2023). Engaging leadership and psychological safety as moderators of the relationship between strain and work recovery: A cross-sectional study of HSS employees. Healthcare, 11(7), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11071045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11071045
Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., Patrick, K. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y
Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 23(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013419.ch1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013419.ch1
Stirpe, L., Profili, S., & Sammarra, A. (2022). Satisfaction with HR practices and employee performance: A moderated mediation model of engagement and health. European Management Journal, 40(2), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.06.003
Tisu, L., Vîrgă, D., & Mermeze, I. (2023). Autonomy and performance: Proactive vitality management and work engagement as sequential mediators of the relationship. Psychological Reports, 126(1), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211048470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211048470
Van Tam, N., Watanabe, T., & Hai, N. L. (2022). Importance of autonomous motivation in construction labor productivity improvement in Vietnam: A self-determination theory perspective. Buildings, 12(6), 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060763
Van Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W. B., & van Rhenen, W. (2020). The satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in engaging leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(2), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21695
Vazquez, A. C. S., Magnan, E. S., Pacico, J. C., Hutz, C. S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico-USF, 20(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200202
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 Aldeci Rufino de Queiroz, Helenides Mendonça, Vinícius Nagy Soares
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
Until 2023, copyright was transferred by the authors to ReA/UFSM. As of 2024, the authors of articles published by the journal retain the copyright to their work. ReA/UFSM operates under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted reuse and distribution of articles, provided the original work is properly cited.
