A complexidade da cooperação climática internacional

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797574226

Palavras-chave:

Cooperação climática internacional, Teoria dos jogos, Dilemas da ação coletiva, Racionalidade neoclássica, Sistemas adaptativos complexos

Resumo

Embora existam vários esforços coletivos para enfrentar o problema das mudanças climáticas, as principais iniciativas, como o Protocolo de Quioto e o Acordo de Paris, não têm apresentado resultados satisfatórios até o momento. A dificuldade em envolver os Estados em práticas cooperativas coordenadas efetivas pode ser explicada como consequência da racionalidade neoclássica, uma vez que a caracterização dos Estados como entidades dotadas de racionalidade os vincul a situações como o jogo do Dilema do Prisioneiro (DP), bem como os dilemas da ação coletiva relacionados a esse jogo. Existem modelos que fornecem maneiras de contornar o PD e promover a cooperação entre agentes racionais egoístas, como por exemplo a aplicação de estratégias baseadas na reciprocidade (Tit-for-Tat) em jogos iterados. No entanto, essas abordagens não evitam a racionalidade neoclássica de curto prazo, que está na raiz do problema. Assim, para desenvolver abordagens mais produtivas para o desenvolvimento de políticas globais para lidar com a mudança climática, apresento uma caracterização do sistema político internacional como um sistema adaptativo complexo (CAS) e argumento que essa perspectiva, acompanhada de modelos baseados em jogos evolutivos em vez de jogos iterados, fornece uma abordagem mais promissora.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Claudio Andrés Téllez Zepeda, Universidade Brasil

Bacharel em Matemática Aplicada (PUC-Rio), mestre em Relações Internacionais (PUC-Rio), doutor em Relações Internacionais (PUC-Rio) e MBA em Gestão de Comércio Exterior e Negócios Internacionais (FGV/RJ).

Referências

ALKER, H. R. Ontological Reflections on Peace and War. In: YANG, A. (Ed.). Intelligent Complex Adaptive Systems. New York: IGI Publishing, 2008. p. 300-330.

AXELROD, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Revised Edition. New York: Basic Books, 2006.

BHARGAVA, R. Individualism in Social Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

CLEMENS JR., W. C. Complexity Science and World Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2013.

CODDINGTON, E. A.; LEVINSON, N. Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955.

CONNOLLY, W. E. Facing the Planetary: Entangled Humanism and the Poltiics of Swarming. Durkham and London: Duke University Press, 2017.

COWDEN, C. C. Game Theory, Evolutionary Stable Strategies and the Evolution of Biological Interactions. Nature Education Knowledge, v. 3, n. 10, p. 6, 2012.

CUDWORTH, E.; HOBDEN, S. Of Parts and Wholes: International Relations beyond the Human. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 41, n. 3, p. 430–450, 2013.

ELLINGSEN, T.; ÖSTLING, R. Strategic risk and coordination failure in blame games.

Economics Letters, v. 110, n. 2, p. 90–92, 2011.

GAAST, W. van der. International Climate Negotiation Factors: Design, Process, Tactics. Groningen: Springer International Publishing, 2017.

GALLIE, W. B. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 56, p. 167–98, 1956.

GARDINER, S. M. A Perfect Moral Storm: Climate Change, Intergenerational Ethics and the Problem of Moral Corruption. Environmental Values, v. 15, n. 3, p. 397-413, 2006.

GEIGES, A.; NAUELS, A.; PARRA, P. Y.; ANDRIJEVIC, M.; HARE, W.; PFLEIDERER, P.; SCHAEFFER, M.; SCHLEUSSNER, C.-F. Incremental improvements of 2030 targets insufficient to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Earth Systems Dynamics, v. 11, n. 3, p. 697–708, 2020.

GELL-MANN, M. Complex Adaptive Systems. In: COWAN, G.; PINES, D.; MELTZER, D. (Eds.). Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Cambridge: Perseus Books, 1999. p. 17-45.

GRUNEWALD, N.; MARTINEZ-ZARZOSO, I. Did the Kyoto Protocol fail? An evaluation of the effect of the Kyoto Protocol on CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1–22, 2015.

HARDIN, G. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science (New Series), v. 162, n. 3859, p. 1243-1248, 1968.

HARRISON, N. E. Complex Systems and the Practice of World Politics. In: HARRISON, N. E. (Ed.). Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006. p. 183-196.

HEITZIG, J.; LESSMAN, K.; ZOU, Y. Self-enforcing strategies to deter free-riding in the climate change mitigation game and other repeated public good games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 108, n. 38, p. 15739–15744, 2011.

LADYMAN, J.; LAMBERT, J.; WIESNER, K. What is a complex system? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, v. 3, n. 1, p. 33–67, 2012.

LEVIN, S. Complex Adaptive Systems: Exploring the Known, the Unknown and the Unknowable. Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society, v. 40, n. 1, p. 3-19, 2002.

LUQMAN, M.; SOYTAS, U.; LI, Y.; AHMAD, N. Rewards and penalties in an evolutionary game theoretic model of international environmental agreements. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, v. 35, n. 1, p. 602-621, 2022.

LYAPUNOV, A. M. The General Problem Of the Stability of Motion. London: Taylor & Francis, 1992.

MAS-COLELL, A.; WHINSTON, M. D.; GREEN, J. R. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

MAYNARD SMITH, J. The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, v. 47, p. 209-221, 1974.

MAYNARD SMITH, J. Evolution and the Theory of Games. American Scientist, v. 64, p. 41-45, 1976.

MAYNARD SMITH, J. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

MAYNARD SMITH, J.; PRICE, G. R. The Logic of Animal Conflict. Nature, v. 246, p. 15-18, 1973.

MIAO, D. Y.; HUANG, W. W.; LI, Y. P.; YANG, Z. F. Planning water resources systems under uncertainty using an interval-fuzzy De Novo programming method. Journal of Environmental Informatics, v. 24, n. 1, p. 11–23, 2014.

NASH, J. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 36, n. 1, p. 48-49, 1950.

NASH, J. Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, v. 54, n. 2, p. 286-295, 1951.

NEUMANN, J. von; MORGENSTERN, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Sixtieth-Anniversary Edition. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007.

NUSSENZVEIG, H. M. (Ed.). Complexidade e Caos. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFRJ/COPEA, 1999.

OLSON, M. The Logic of Collective Action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

OSTROM, E. Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges. Science, v. 284, n. 5412, p. 278–282, 1999.

PRESSMAN, S. The two dogmas of neoclassical economics. Science & Society, v. 68, n. 4, p. 483-493, 2004.

RAPOPORT, A.; CHAMMAH, A. M. Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1965.

ROCHA, A. B. da S.; SALOMÃO, G. M. Environmental policy regulation and corporate compliance in evolutionary game models with well-mixed and structured populations. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 279, n. 2, p. 486-501, 2019.

ROSEN, A. M. The Wrong Solution at the Right Time: The Failure of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change. Politics & Policy, v. 43, n. 1, p. 30-58, 2015.

SIMON, H. A. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, v. 106, n. 6, p. 467–482, 1962.

SÖDERBAUM, P. Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecological Economics, v. 28, n. 2, p. 161-170, 1999.

TINGLEY, D.; TOMZ, M. Conditional Cooperation and Climate Change. Comparative Political Studies, v. 47, n. 3, p. 344–368, 2014.

UDEHN, L. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge, 2001.

UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1992. In: https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf. Accessed em: 12 feb. 2023.

VATN, A. Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, v. 55, n. 2, p. 203-217, 2005.

WIGHT, C. Theorizing International Relations: Emergence, Organized Complexity, and Integrative Pluralism. In: KAVALSKI, E. (Ed.). World politics at the edge of chaos: reflection on complexity and global life. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2015. p. 53-77.

WIGHT, C. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

XUE, H.; LIN, S.; WANG, W.; FU, K.; HUANG, K. Evolutionary Analysis of Emission Reduction Strategies. Academic Journal of Business and Management, v. 4, n. 17, p. 112-120, 2022.

ZAFIROVSKI, M. Classical and neoclassical conceptions of rationality: findings of an exploratory survey. The Journal of Socio-Economics, v. 37, p. 789-820, 2008.

ZHANG, S.; WANG, C.; YU, C. The evolutionary game analysis and simulation with system dynamics of manufacturer's emissions abatement behavior under cap-and-trade regulation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, v. 355, p. 343-355, 2019.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-03-15

Como Citar

Zepeda, C. A. T. (2023). A complexidade da cooperação climática internacional. Revista InterAção, 14(1), e74226. https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797574226

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)