From strategic lessons to national capability: defence governance, technological human capital, and the Defence Industrial Base in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797596728

Keywords:

Defence governance, Capability development, Defence Industrial Base, Technological autonomy, Brazil

Abstract

This article examines how defence governance can contribute to transforming contemporary strategic lessons and emerging technological demands into sustainable national defence capabilities in Brazil. The central argument is that the Brazilian challenge is not merely to identify critical capabilities, such as unmanned systems, artificial intelligence, cyber defence, resilient logistics, air defence, coastal defence and strategic deterrence. Rather, the decisive challenge lies in institutionalising governance mechanisms capable of prioritising, funding, monitoring and coordinating these capabilities through the Ministry of Defence, the Armed Forces, the Defence Industrial Base, universities, research centres and the productive sector. The article adopts a defence governance perspective based on leadership, strategy and control, with emphasis on portfolio governance, risk management, assurance, performance indicators, interagency coordination and qualified civil engagement. Methodologically, it combines documentary analysis, selective literature review and institutional interpretation of contemporary trends in defence, technology and innovation. Its main contribution is to propose a governance-of-technological-capabilities framework for Brazil, connecting strategic diagnosis, technological human capital, industrial innovation, risk management, institutional coordination and accountability. The article concludes that defence autonomy depends not only on the acquisition of advanced systems, but also on stable institutional routines capable of converting strategic warnings into effective, sustainable and verifiable defence capabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcelo Carvalho Ribeiro, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

Bacharel em Direito, Mestre em Operações Militares, Doutor em Ciências Militares pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Graduado em Ciências Militares pela Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras; General de Brigada da reserva do Exército Brasileiro; Mestrando em Relações Internacionais, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

Mauro Beirão, AEL Sistemas S.A.

Graduado em Engenharia Mecânica; Gerente de Marketing, AEL Sistemas S.A., Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

References

AMARANTE, José Carlos Albano do. A base industrial de defesa brasileira. Texto para Discussão, n. 1758. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA, 2012. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/1091. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

ANDRADE, Israel de Oliveira; LEITE, Alixandro Werneck. A indústria de defesa no contexto da política de inovação. In: TURCHI, Lenita Maria; MORAIS, José Mauro de (org.). Políticas de apoio à inovação tecnológica no Brasil: avanços recentes, limitações e propostas de ações. Brasília: IPEA, 2017.

BEVIR, Mark. A theory of governance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. O poder simbólico. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2002.

BRASIL. Decreto nº 9.203, de 22 de novembro de 2017. Dispõe sobre a política de governança da administração pública federal direta, autárquica e fundacional. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/decreto/d9203.htm. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

BRASIL. Decreto nº 12.725, de 18 de novembro de 2025. Aprova a Política Nacional de Defesa, a Estratégia Nacional de Defesa e o Livro Branco de Defesa Nacional. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2025/decreto/D12725.htm. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

CONRAN, James; THELEN, Kathleen. Institutional change. In: FIORETOS, Orfeo; FALLETI, Tulia G.; SHEINGATE, Adam (ed.). The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

CORREA FILHO, Sérgio Leite Schmitt et al. Panorama sobre a indústria de defesa e segurança no Brasil. BNDES Setorial, Rio de Janeiro, n. 38, p. 373-408, set. 2013. Disponível em: https://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/handle/1408/2684. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

DAVIS, Paul K. Analytic architecture for capabilities-based planning, mission-system analysis, and transformation. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2002. Disponível em: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1513.html. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

ETZKOWITZ, Henry; LEYDESDORFF, Loet. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, v. 29, n. 2, p. 109-123, 2000.

FEAVER, Peter D. Armed servants: agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.

HUNTINGTON, Samuel P. The soldier and the state: the theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.

MAZZUCATO, Mariana. Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 27, n. 5, p. 803-815, 2018.

NATO. Russian war against Ukraine: lessons learned curriculum guide. Brussels: NATO, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/deep/231208-RusWar-Ukraine-Lessons-Curriculum-Guide-en.pdf. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

NEGRETE, Ana Carolina Aguilera et al. Mapeamento da base industrial de defesa. Brasília: IPEA, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/items/cd247fb9-ec27-434d-b7e4-948ccee16de3. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

RAND CORPORATION. Capabilities-based planning. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, s.d. Disponível em: https://www.rand.org/topics/capabilities-based-planning.html. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

SLUSHER, Matthew. Lessons from the Ukraine conflict: modern warfare in the age of autonomy, information, and resilience. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.csis.org/analysis/lessons-ukraine-conflict-modern-warfare-age-autonomy-information-and-resilience. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

STOLL, Hunter; HOEHN, John; COURTNEY, William. Air defense shapes warfighting in Ukraine. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2024/02/air-defense-shapes-warfighting-in-ukraine.html. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Referencial básico de governança aplicável a organizações públicas e outros entes jurisdicionados ao TCU. 3. ed. Brasília: TCU, 2020. Disponível em: https://portal.tcu.gov.br/imprensa/noticias/tcu-publica-a-3%C2%AA-edicao-do-referencial-basico-de-governanca-organizacional. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

ZABRODSKYI, Mykhaylo; WATLING, Jack; DANYLYUK, Oleksandr V.; REYNOLDS, Nick. Preliminary lessons in conventional warfighting from Russia's invasion of Ukraine: February-July 2022. London: Royal United Services Institute, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/preliminary-lessons-conventional-warfighting-russias-invasion-ukraine-february-july-2022. Acesso em: 14 maio 2026.

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Ribeiro, M. C., & Beirão, M. (2026). From strategic lessons to national capability: defence governance, technological human capital, and the Defence Industrial Base in Brazil. InterAção, 17(2), e96728. https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797596728