Construtivismo e teoria crítica: uma possibilidade de diálogo entre Bourdieu e Cox nas Relações Internacionais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797534376Keywords:
construtivismo, teoria crítica, Pierre Bourdieu, Robert Cox, reflexividade, ontologia reflexiva.Abstract
This article aimed to compare the constructivist approaches in IR through Pierre Bourdieu's ideas with Critical Theory represented by Robert Cox ideas. Our main hypothesis is that it is possible to compare these authors ideas, due to their shared reflexive ontology critical to scientific positivism, in which structural view of society is present in categories socially and historically constructed, giving dynamism and criticism in the way that science is made. At the end it we concluded that comparisons between the authors are possible, and the hypothesis is confirmed as well, since the peculiarities of the construction of both ideas are respected, not incurring methodological errors or bias in the research.Downloads
References
ADLER-NISSEN, Rebecca. “Introduction”. In: ADLER-NISSEN, Rebecca. Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR. New York: Routledge, 2013. pp. 1-24.
__________. Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR. New York: Routledge, 2013.
BIGO, D. “Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practice and Practice of Power”. In: International Political Sociology, v.5, n.3, 2011, pp.225-258.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. O Poder Simbólico. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1989. 311p.
__________. Sobre o Estado: Cursos no Collège de France (1989-92). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2014. 574 p.
__________. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Polity Press, 1990.
COX, Robert W. “Gramsci, hegemony and International Relations: an essay in method”. In: GILL, Stephen. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and international Relations. Toronto: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Cap. 2. pp. 49-66.
__________. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”. In: Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, out., 1981, pp. 126-155.
GIDDENS, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984. 402 p.
GILL, Stephen. “Epistemology, ontology, and the 'Italian School”. In: GILL, Stephen. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and international Relations. Toronto: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Cap. 1. p. 21-48.
GUZZINI, Stefano. A reconstruction of constructivism in International Relations. In: European Journal Of International Relations. London, fev., 2000, pp. 147-182.
HOPF, Ted. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”. In: International Security, v. 23, n. 1, Summer, 1998, pp. 171-200.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Rápido e Devagar: Duas formas de pensar. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2012. 588 p.
KAPLAN, Morton A. “The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations”. In: World Politics, v. 19, n. 1, oct., 1966, pp. 1-20.
KUHN, Thomas S. A Estrutura das Revoluções Científicas. São Paulo: Editoria Perspectiva, 1962. 258 p.
LAKATOS, Imre. Metodología de los Programas de Investigación Científica, Alianza, Madrid, 1993.
LEANDER, A. “The Promises, Problems, and Potentials of a Bourdieu-Inspired staging of International Relations”. In: International Political Sociology, v. 5, n.3, 2011, pp. 294-313.
NEUFELD, Mark. “Reflexivity and International Relations”. In: Millennium: Journal of International Studies, London, v. 22, n. 1, summer, 1993, pp.53-76.
POULIOT, Vincent; MÉRAND, P. “Political sociology in international relations”. In: ADLER-NISSEN, Rebecca. Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR. New York: Routledge, 2013. pp. 43-64
WALTZ, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
WENDT, Alexander E. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory”. In: Internacional Organization, Cambridge, v. 41, n. 3, jun., 1987, pp. 335-370.
__________. “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics”. In: International Organization, v. 46, n. 2, Spring, 1992, pp. 391-425.
