SPATIAL DEPENDENCE MEASURES BASED ON TWO PARAMETRIC SEMIVARIOGRAM PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X18049Keywords:
Estatística espacial, Geoestatística, Análise variográfica, Variabilidade espacial, Medidas descritivasAbstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179460X18049
On studying the semivariogram, there is the possibility of estimating descriptive measures of spatial dependence degree. In this study, we aimed to show two spatial dependence measures developed from two distinct geometric perspectives of the semivariogram. The first measure, named IDE1, is based on the concept of spatial dependence areas found in the semivariogram; while the second, named IDE2, is based on the concept that the semivariogram has two distinct areas, an of spatial dependence, and other of non-spatial dependence. The IDE1 is identical to the DE index found in the literature, so that it is possible to state that the mathematical proof of the DE index was from the geometry of semivariogram. The IDE2 is more complete than the IDE1 index because it considers the factor of model, showing that there are differences in spatial dependence of phenomena obtained from their relating models. These two indices do not contemplate the practice reach. Thus, we may consider that the estimates of IDE1 and IDE2 may be used to describe the spatial dependence; however, they should be used along with other measures which contemplate the reach of the spatial dependence.
Downloads
References
BIONDI, F.; MYERS, D. E.; AVERY, C. C.
Geostatistically modeling stem size and
increment in an old-growth forest. Canadian
Journal of Forest Research, Ottawa, v. 24, n. 7, p.
-1368, July 1994.
CAMBARDELLA, C.A.; MOORMAN, T.B.;
NOVAK, J.M.; PARKIN, T.B.; KARLEN, D.L.;
TURCO, R.F. & KONOPKA, A.E. Field-scale
variability of soil properties in Central Iowa
soils. Soil Science Society America Journal,
Madison, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1501-1511, Sept./Oct. 1994.
CARVALHO, J. R. P.; SILVEIRA, P. M.; VIEIRA,
S. R. Geoestatística na determinação da
variabilidade espacial de características químicas
do solo sob diferentes preparos. Pesquisa
Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 37, n. 8, p.
-1159, ago. 2002. Disponível em:
<http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_artte
xt&pid=S0100-
X2002000800013&lng=en&nrm=iso/v37n8/&tl
ng=pt>. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2015. doi:
1590/S0100-204X2002000800013.
ISAAKS, E. H.; SRIVASTAVA, R. M. Applied
geostatistics. New York: Oxford University,
561 p.
OLIVEIRA, M. C. N.; BARBIN, D.; SILVA, E. F.;
MACEDO, J. R.; CAPECHE, C. L.; HISSA, H. R.
Estimação dos parâmetros de uma função de
covariância no estudo da variabilidade espacial
do teor de cálcio no solo. Revista de Matemática
e Estatística, Marília, v. 24, n. 4, p. 117-132, 2006.
Disponível em:
<http://jaguar.fcav.unesp.br/RME/fasciculos/v24/
v24_n4/A8_Cristina.pdf>. Acesso em: 02 abr.
SEIDEL, E. J. Novas contribuições para
avaliação e descrição da estrutura de
dependência espacial em Geoestatística. Lavras,
146 p. Tese (Doutorado em Estatística e
Experimentação Agropecuária), Universidade
Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2013.
SEIDEL, E. J.; OLIVEIRA, M. S. Proposta de uma
generalização para os modelos de
semivariogramas exponencial e gaussiano.
Semina: Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, v. 34, n.
, p. 125-132, 2013. Disponível em:
<http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seme
xatas/article/view/14114>. Acesso em: 02 abr.
doi: 10.5433/1679-0375.2013v34n1p125.
SEIDEL, E. J.; OLIVEIRA, M. S. Novo índice
geoestatístico para a mensuração da
dependência espacial. Revista Brasileira de
Ciência do Solo, v. 38, n. 3, p. 699-705, 2014a.
Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.
php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-
&lng=pt&nrm=iso>. Acesso
em: 20 jul. 2014. doi: 10.1590/S0100-
SEIDEL, E. J.; OLIVEIRA, M. S. Proposta de um
teste de hipótese para a existência de
dependência espacial em dados geoestatísticos.
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, v. 20, n. 4, p.
-764, 2014b. Disponível em:
<http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_artte
xt&pid=S1982-
&lng=en&nrm=iso>. Acesso
em: 18 abr. 2015. doi: 10.1590/S1982-
SILVA, F. M.; ALVES, M. C.; SOUZA, J. C. S.;
OLIVEIRA, M. S. Efeitos da colheita manual na
bienalidade do cafeeiro em Ijaci, Minas Gerais.
Ciência e Agrotecnologia, Lavras, v. 34, n. 3, p.
-632, maio/jun. 2010. Disponível em:
<http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_artte
xt&pid=S1413-
&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt>.
Acesso em: 18 abr. 2015. doi: 10.1590/S1413-
ZIMBACK, C.R.L. Análise espacial de atributos
químicos de solos para fins de mapeamento da
fertilidade do solo. Botucatu, 2001. 114f. Tese
(Livre-Docência em Levantamento do solo e
Fotopedologia), Universidade Estadual Paulista,
Botucatu, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.