Breakeven price of CO2 credits driving farmers to use the area to plant forest instead of grain

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509873352

Mots-clés :

Carbon offset, Soybeans, Eucalyptus, Carbon credit, Reforestation

Résumé

Afforestation and reforestation were the challenges the farmer can seize to plant a culture that can capture more carbon than the amount emitted for cultivation. Assuming that the land was legally rented and owned, and part of an area that had not been obtained through recent deforestation, the main questions were: “why a farmer should have preferred to reserve the area to plant trees?”; and “How much did one ton of Carbon Dioxide [CO2] have to be rewarded to buy this opportunity?” This work had the target to estimate which was the minimum price for carbon credit so that the farmer will plant a forest instead of using the soil for grain cultivation. Based on the analysis that economic aspects and profit were the main drivers considered by the farmer to decide how to use the soil in case the area was not classified as Legal Reserve or Permanent Protection Area, seeking the usage which maximized the value per hectare. Considering a eucalyptus commercial forest planted under the premises of the current study, results showed that a price of around 24 BRL per ton of CO2 in 2021 is enough to turn it economically feasible. Business case had been estimated with and without profit coming from the commercial use of forest, and even assuming that no wood is cut and sold, the 2021 price of 40,48 BRL per ton of CO2 can ensure more profit than grain production over 14 years timeframe, allowing the farmer to make money beyond the usual commercial use of a forest.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Marco Palumbo, University of São Paulo

Specialist in Agribusiness
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

Risely Ferraz-Almeida, University of São Paulo

Técnica Ambiental (IFBA, 2007), Agrônoma (UESB, 2012), e Graduanda em Ciência de Dados (UNIVESP), com MBA em Gestão de Projetos (USP/ESALQ, 2020), Mestrado (UFU, 2014), Doutorado (UNESP, e University of Minnesota, 2017), e Pós-doutorados (USP/ESALQ, 2019; 2021) em Ciência do Solo.

Références

APPUNN, K. 2021. Carbon markets – COP26 closes biggest loopholes but lacks clarity on voluntary trade. Available in: https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/carbon-markets-cop26-closes-biggest-loopholes-lacks-clarity-voluntary-trade. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

ALTARUGIO, L.M.; SAVIETO, J.; MACHADO, B.A.; MIGLIAVACCA, R.A.; ALMEIDA, R.F.; ZAVASCHI, E.; CARNEIRO, L.M.S.; VITTI, G.C.; OTTO, R. Differences of optimal management practices for corn cultivated during summer and fall in the tropics. Communications In Soil Science And Plant Analysis, v. 50, p. 1-12, 2018.

BACILIERI, F. S.; OLIVEIRA, R.C.; FERRAZ-ALMEIDA, R.; MAGELA, M.L.M.; LANA, R.M.Q. Testing foliar biofertilizer based on natural fungal extract and nutrients on corn yield. Journal of plant nutrition, v. 46, p. 1-9, 2023.

BARBOSA, N.C.; PEREIRA, H.S.; ARRUDA, E.M.; BROD, E.; ALMEIDA, R.F. Spatial distribution of phosphorus in the soil and soybean yield as function of fertilization methods. Bioscience Journal, v. 34, p. 88-94, 2018

BATISTA, D.O.; NAKAJIMA, N.Y.; CHANG, M.; HALISKI, M. Determinaçao da quantidade de madeira, carbono e renda da plantaçao florestal. Embrapa Florestas, number 220, Colombo, PR, Brasil, 2011, 39 p.

BRISTOW, S. Business and climate change: Rising Awareness Creates Significant Opportunity. United Nation Chronicles, New York, NY, United States. 2007.

COSTA, W.; FONSECA, E.; KÖRTING, T. Classifying grasslands and cultivated pastures in the Brazilian cerrado using support vector machines, multilayer perceptrons, and autoencoders. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg. Germany. v. 9166. p.187–198. 2015.

CARBON OFFSET GUIDE. Carbon offset guide. 2021. Available in: https://www.offsetguide.org/understanding-carbon-offsets/what-is-a-carbon-offset/. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Série histórica das safras. 2022. Available in: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/serie-historica-das-safras?start=20. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

CORRÊA, R.S.; SOARES, T.S.; ALVES, M.A.; SOUZA, J.P.; VIEIRA, E.M. Espaçamentos de plantio promovem produção distinta em híbrido de eucalipto. Advances in Forestry Science, Cuiabá, n. 3, v. 7, p. 1073-1079, 2020.

DE OLIVEIRA NETO, A. 2016. A Cultura do Milho: análise dos custos de produção e rentabilidade nos anos-safra 2007 a 2017. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento - CONAB, Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Embrapa - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Bioma Cerrado. 2022. Avaliable in: https://www.embrapa.br/contando-ciencia/bioma-cerrado. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

European Commission. 2030 Climate Target Plan. EC, Bruxelles, Belgica, 2020.

FARIA, I.K.P.; VIEIRA, J.L.V; TENELLI, S.; ALMEIDA, R.E.M.; CAMPOS, L.J.M; COSTA, R.V.; ZAVASCHI, E.; ALMEIDA, R.F.; CARNEIRO, L.M.S.; OTTO, R. Optimal plant density and nitrogen rates for improving off-season corn yields in Brazil. Scientia Agricola, v. 76, p. 344-352, 2019.

FERRAZ-ALMEIDA, R.; DA MOTA, R. P. Routes of Soil Uses and Conversions with the Main Crops in Brazilian Cerrado: A Scenario from 2000 to 2020. Land, v. 10, p. 1135, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111135

GONÇALVES, J.C.; OLIVEIRA, A.D.; CARVALHO, S.P.C.; GOMIDE, L.R. Análise econômica da rotação florestal de povoamentos de eucalipto utilizando a simulação de Monte Carlo. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, n. 4, v. 27, p. 1339-1347, 2017.

KIZZIER, K.; LEVIN, K.; RAMBHAROS, M. What you need to know about article 6 of the paris agreement. 2019. Available in: https://www.wri.org/insights/what-you-need-know-about-article-6-paris-agreement. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

LIN, C.; LIN, C. H. Comparison of carbon sequestration potential in agricultural and afforestation farming systems. Forestry Science, n. 70, v. 2, p. 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000200006

OLIVEIRA, E.B. SisEucalipto e SisILPFEucalipto. Embrapa Florestas, Brasilia, DF, Brasil, 2021.

REDD MONITOR. Redd-monitor.org. 2014. Available in: https://redd-monitor.org/2014/07/01/putting-a-price-on-forest-carbon-how-much-will-the-world-banks-carbon-fund-pay-for-redd-carbon-credits. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

SCARFÓ, F.; MERCURIO, R. Applicato ad una faggeta sotto Forest Management nel sud Italia. Dipartimento di Gestione si Sistemi Agrari e Forestali, Reggio Calabria, Italy, 2009.

SPECHT, A.; WEST, P. Estimation of biomass and sequestered carbon on farm forest plantations in northern New South Wales. p. 363-379. Biomass and Bioenergy, New South Wales, Australia, 2003.

SPELTZ, R.; FERRAZ-ALMEIDA, R. Conversion of the planted forest with pinus to grain production in Tibagi, Paraná: a study showing the economic perspectives. Advances in forestry science, v. 8, p. 1489-1496, 2021.

STUART, G. J. 2021. COP26 - Prospects for Carbon Offsets and Markets. Available in: https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/insight/publications/2021/09/cop26-prospects-for-carbon-offsets-and-market. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

THOMAS, E.; JALONEN, R.; LOO, J.; BOSHIER, D.; GALLO, L.; CAVERS, S.; BORDÁCS, S.; SMITH, P.; BOZZANO, M. Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. FAO and Biodiversity International, Rome, Italy, 2014.

TENG, X.; FAN-PENG, L.; YUNG-HO, C. The change in energy and carbon emissions efficiency after afforestation in China by applying a modified dynamic SBM model. Energy, v. 216, p.119301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119301

WORLBANK. What you need to know about article 6 of the Paris Agreement. 2022. Available in: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2022/05/17/what-you-need-to-know-about-article-6-of-the-paris-agreement. Accessed in: 26 Nov. 2022.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2023-09-29

Comment citer

Palumbo, M., & Ferraz-Almeida, R. (2023). Breakeven price of CO2 credits driving farmers to use the area to plant forest instead of grain. Ciência Florestal, 33(3), e73352. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509873352