FOREST RESTORATION IN THE ATLANTIC FOREST: PASSIVE RESTORATION, NUCLEATION AND HIGH DIVERSITY PLANTATION

Authors

  • Bruna Elisa Trentin
  • Daniela Aparecida Estevan
  • Elson Felipe Sandoli Rossetto
  • Mauricio Romero Gorenstein
  • Gilmar Poser Brizola
  • Fernando Campanhã Bechara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509831647

Keywords:

nucleation techniques, filling and diversity lines, ecological restoration.

Abstract

Due to the increasing environmental degradation, the understanding of how reforestation and other restoration techniques function became fundamental to base the reestablishment of degraded ecosystems. The aim of this study was to perform a vegetation survey in a restoration site through three different techniques. The study site has 7.2 ha in a subtropical forest in Dois Vizinhos, Paraná state, Brazil and it is approximately 20 m from a secondary forest fragment. The experiment consisted of 12 plots with three treatments (T1-3) randomly distributed in four blocks. T1:natural regeneration through passive restoration. T2: set of nucleation techniques. T3: seedlings planted through filling and diversity lines (3x2 m). For sampling purposes, each plot was divided into 24 subplots. In order to evaluate plant presence, two years and eight months after the treatments implementation, a survey was conducted in three random subplots for each plot, where all plants taller than 50


cm were identified and quantified. Native species richness was higher than 87% in all treatments, whereas the presence of herbaceous species was higher at passive restoration and woody species at plantation. The most common dispersal syndromes were anemochory and zoochory. By comparing planted and regenerated individuals for the three treatments, the plantation technique had the highest Shannon diversity index (3.017), with 148 individuals and 53 species sampled. However, there was no statistically significant difference. This higher diversity is related to the larger number of species planted, but it is still not facilitating regeneration species in its understory at this age. Considering only regenerated individuals, nucleation showed the highest Shannon diversity index (2.078) with a total of 908 individuals of 40 species, however, it wasn’t statistically significant different of passive restoration (Shannon = 1.965) which had 2,018 individuals of 40 species. The most floristic similar treatments were passive restoration and nucleation. Nucleation facilitated species natural regeneration (17 planted and 40 regenerated species) while passive restoration showed high resilience, therefore the use of passive restoration can be considered an effective alternative since its results did not differ statistically from nucleation, and the main advantage of this technique is the reduced cost.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AIDE, T. M. et al. Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: implications for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, Washington, v. 8, n. 4, p. 328-338, dez. 2000.

BECHARA, F. C. et al. Neotropical rainforest restoration: comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, Amsterdam, v. 25, n. 11, p. 2021-2034, jul. 2016.

BOANARES, D.; AZEVEDO, C. S. The use of nucleation techniques to restore the environment: a bibliometric analysis. Natureza e Conservação, Ouro Preto, v. 12, n. 2, p. 93-98, 2014.

BRANCALION, P. S.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; GANDOLFI, S. Restauração florestal. 1. ed. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2015. 432 p.

BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Plano setorial de mitigação e de adaptação às mudanças climáticas para a consolidação de uma economia de baixa emissão de carbono na agricultura: plano ABC (Agricultura de Baixa Emissão de Carbono). Brasília: MAPA, 2012. 173 p.

CORBIN, J. D.; HOLL, K. D. Applied nucleation as a forest restoration strategy. Forest Ecology and Management, Netherlands, v. 265, p. 37-46, 2012.

ENGEL, V. L.; PARROTTA, J. A. Definindo a restauração ecológica: tendências e perspectivas mundiais. In: KAGEYAMA, P. Y. et al. (Org.). Restauração ecológica de ecossistemas naturais. Botucatu: Fundação de Estudos e Pesquisas Agrícolas e Florestais, 2003. p. 3-26.

FIORENTIN, L. D. et al. Análise florística e padrão espacial da regeneração natural em área de Floresta Ombrófila Mista na região de Caçador, SC. Floram, Seropédica, v. 22, n. 1, p. 60-70, 2015.

GOMEZ-APARICIO, L. et al. Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration: a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants. Ecological Applications, Tempe, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1128-1138, 2004.

HOLL, K. D.; AIDE, T. M. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? Forest Ecology and Management, Netherlands, v. 261, p. 1558-1563, 2011.

HOWE, H. F.; SMALLWOOD, J. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, Palo Alto, v. 13, p. 201-228, 1982.

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS (Brasil). SOS Mata Atlântica e INPE apresentam dados do Atlas dos Remanescentes Florestais da Mata Atlântica. 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.inpe.br/noticias/noticia.php?Cod_Noticia=3610>. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2015.

LIEBSCH, D.; ACRA, L. A. Riqueza de espécies de sub-bosque de um fragmento de Floresta Ombrófila Mista em Tijucas do Sul – PR. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 14, n. 1, p. 67-76, 2004.

MORRISON, E. B.; LINDELL, C. A. Active or passive forest restoration? assessing restoration alternatives with avian foraging behavior. Restoration Ecology, Washington, v. 19, n. 201, p. 170-177, mar. 2011.

PIJL, L. van der. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982. 402 p.

REIS, A.; BECHARA, F. C.; TRES, D. R. Nucleation in tropical ecological restoration. Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 67, n. 2, p. 244-250, mar./abr. 2010.

REIS, A. et al. Nucleação: concepção biocêntrica para a restauração ecológica. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 24, n. 2, p. 509-518, abr./jun. 2014.

RODRIGUES, R. R. et al. Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, Netherlands, v. 261, p. 1605-1613, 2011.

RODRIGUES, R. R. et al. On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation, Boston, v. 142, n. 6, p. 1242-1251, 2009.

SOUZA, R. P. M. et al. Estrutura e aspectos da regeneração natural de Floresta Ombrófila Mista no Parque Estadual de Campos do Jordão, SP, Brasil. Hoehnea, São Paulo, v. 39, n. 3, p. 387-407, 2012.

VOGEL, H. F.; CAMPOS, J. B.; BECHARA, F. C. Early bird assemblages under different subtropical forest restoration strategies in Brazil: passive, nucleation and high diversity plantation. Tropical Conservation Science, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 4, p. 912-939, 2015.

WADT, P. G. S. Práticas de conservação do solo e recuperação de áreas degradadas. Rio Branco: Embrapa Acre, 2003.

Published

2018-04-02

How to Cite

Trentin, B. E., Estevan, D. A., Rossetto, E. F. S., Gorenstein, M. R., Brizola, G. P., & Bechara, F. C. (2018). FOREST RESTORATION IN THE ATLANTIC FOREST: PASSIVE RESTORATION, NUCLEATION AND HIGH DIVERSITY PLANTATION. Ciência Florestal, 28(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509831647

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)