Avaliação da Qualidade da Água Subterrânea em Poço no Campus da UFSM, Santa Maria - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9761Abstract
The article results of a research of scientific initiation whichobjective is to monitorate the punctual quality of the groundwater in theCampus of Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - RS, through theevaluation of physiochemical parameters, analyzed in 37 samples collectedweekly in the "well top" PB 20, one of the 20 wells that at that time were in activity for the provisioning of the Campus. Although the results havesuffered oscillations, they are inside of the hidro-sanitary conditions andof the limits and norms demanded for the human consumption in agreementwith the Entrance 518/2005 of Brazilian Health Ministery.Downloads
References
CNRH - CONSELHO NACIONAL DE RECURSOS HÍDRICOS - Resolução Nº 15, de 11 de janeiro de 2001. Disponível em: http://www.cnrh-srh.gov.br/deliberal/resoluções/R015.htm. Acesso em 17 dez. 2005.
CPRM - COMPANHIA DE PESQUISA E RECURSOS MINERAIS. Relatório do Poço PB - 20 - UFSM. Superintendência Regional de Porto
Alegre. Diretoria de Recursos Minerais. Diretoria de Recursos Minerais. Departamento de Exploração. Fev/1996. 17 p.
FEITOSA, A. C. F.; MANOEL FILHO, J. Hidrogeologia - conceitos e aplicações. CPRM - Serviço Geológico do Brasil, Editora Gráfica LCR:
Fortaleza, 1997. 389p.
FOSTER, S. et. al. Determinação de riscos de contaminação das águas subterrâneas: uma metodologia embasada em dados pré-existentes. São Paulo: instituto Geológico, 1993. 87 p.
FENZEL, N. Introdução á hidrogeoquímica. Belém: UFP, 1986. 189 p.
GASPARETTO, N. V. L. et al. Mapa Geológico da Folha de Santa Maria. FINEP - UFSM, 1998.
GREGORASHUK, J. de los S. Estúdio Del uso actual y potencial Del acuífero guaraní: enero 2001. Disponível em: http:/www.sgguarani.org.pdf. Acesso em: 02 mar. 2005.
GIARDIN, A.; FACCINI, U. Complexidade hidroestratigráfica e estrutural do Sistema Aqüífero Guarani: abordagem metodológica
aplicada ao exemplo da área de Santa Maria-RS, Brasil. Revista Águas Subterrâneas. nº18 ABAS. 01/2004 p.39-53.
MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE. Portaria N° 518, de 25 de março de 2004. Atualiza as disposições da Portaria N° 1469, de 29 de dezembro de 2000. Brasília, 2004.
MOREIRA, C. M. D. Aspectos qualitativos da água subterrânea no Campus da UFSM, Santa Maria - RS. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2005. 174 p.
NIMER, E. Clima. In: Geografia do Brasil: Região Sul. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1990 v. 2. p. 153-187.
REBOUÇAS, A. da, C. Águas Subterrâneas. BRAGA, B.; REBOUÇAS; A. da, C; TUNDISI, J. G. (Org). Águas doces no Brasil: capital ecológico, uso e conservação. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Escrituras Editora, 2002. p 119 - 149.
SEMA. SECRETARIA DO MEIO-AMBIENTE DO ESTADO DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Recursos hídricos. Disponível em: http:/www.sema.rs.gov.Br/sema/html/rechidro.htm Acesso em: 15 mar. 2006.
SILVA, J. L. S. da. et all. 2006. Relatório Final do Projeto. N ° 10/OEA/ GEF/SG.pdf, 195p
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
