What God and a notion of health have to do with the socio-environmental conflicts in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X39995Keywords:
Fiocruz, CPT, Socio-Environmental ConflictsAbstract
The Pastoral Land Commission (CPT) signs a dense work about socio-environmental conflicts in the country, the Conflict in the Field Brazil, which unveils mobilizations of subjects before imminent or deflagrated actions against their ways of lives. The information denounces and foresees the conflictive scenario of the country, due to the recurrence of the data. The Map of Conflicts involving Environmental Injustice and the Health in Brazil denounces, on a website, national conflicts and is authored by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz). We analyzed the Map - site and book about the tool - and 14 editions of Conflicts in the Field Brazil. In this article, we highlight distinctive and common aspects of both and the correlations with religion made by the CPT in publicizing the conflicts and, in the case of Fiocruz, why such struggles involve a comprehensive understanding of health.
Downloads
References
BALDUINO, Dom Tomás. Em meio à paixão e à esperança. In: Conflitos no Campo Brasil: 2003. AFONSO, José Batista Gonçalves; CANUTO, Antonio; LUZ, Regina Cassia Silva Luz. Goiânia: CPT, 2004. ISSN 1676-661.
BISPOS, Conferência Nacional dos. Igreja e problemas da terra. Itaici: CNBB, 1980. 20 p. Disponível em: https://pstrindade.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/cnbb-doc-17-igreja-e-problemas-da-terra.pdf. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2018.
BOECKER, Hans Jochen. Os Pobres Possuirão a Terra: Pronunciamento de bispos e pastores sinodais sobre a terra. Cidade: São Paulo. Editora Sinodal, 2004.
BOECKER, Hans Jochen. Conflitos no Campo Brasil: 2011. Goiânia: CPT, 2012.
BOECKER, Hans Jochen. Conflitos no Campo Brasil: 2013. Goiânia: CPT, 2014.
CANUTO, Antonio; COSTA, Edmundo Rodrigues Costa; LUZ, Cássia Regina da Silva. Conflitos no Campo Brasil: 2014. Goiânia: CPT, 2015.
CORTES, Pe. José Cortes. O Baixo Amazonas entre conflitos. In: Conflitos no Campo – Brasil 2010/ CPT; organização e seleção: Antônio Canuto, Cássia Regina da Silva Luz, Isolete Wichinieski. Goiânia: CPT, 2011.
DIAS, Edson Matias. Ecologia, Mundialização e Espiritualidade. Caminhos, Goiânia, v. 8, n. 2, p.171-206, dez. 2010. Disponível em: http://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/caminhos/article/view/1344/908. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2018.
FAUSTINO, Cristiane et. al. O Mapa como Espaço de Cidadania: reflexões e continuidades. In: Injustiça ambiental e saúde no Brasil: o Mapa de conflitos. PORTO, Marcelo Firpo; PACHECO, Tania; LEOY, Jean Pierre (org.). Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ, 2013.
FERREIRA, Lúcia da Costa. A Equação Dinâmica entre Conflitos Sociais, Recursos Naturais e Desastres Ambientais: O Estado da Arte e uma Proposta Teórica. In: VI Encontro Nacional da Anppas. Belém, 2012.
FREITAS, Carlos Machado de. A produção científica sobre o ambiente na saúde coletiva. Cad. Saúde Pública [online]. 2005, vol.21, n.3, pp.679-701. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csp/v21n3/03.pdf. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2018.
GALLAZZI, Anna Maria Rizzante. Conflitos, violência: um olhar pastoral. In: Conflitos no Campo – Brasil 2013. Coordenação: Antônio Canuto, Cássia Regina da Silva Luz, Flávio Lazzarin. Goiânia: CPT Nacional, Brasil, 2014.
GALTUNG, Johan. Peace By Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. Oslo: Sage Publications, 1996. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/wsUT52. Acesso em: 19 de mar. de 2017.
HAYES, Bernadette C.; MARANGUDAKIS, Manussos. Religion and Environmental Issues within Anglo-American Democracies. Review Of Religious Research, London, v. 42, n. 2, p.159-174, dez. 2000. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3512527. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2018.
LEROY, Joaquim Pierre; PORTO, Marcelo Firpo; PACHECO, Tania (org.). Mapa de Conflitos Envolvendo Injustiça Ambiental e Saúde no Brasil. 2010. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/T5BT1d. Acesso em: 19 de mar. 2017.
PAIM, Jairnilson Silva. Desafios para a Saúde Coletiva no Século XXI. Salvador: Edufba, 2006. 154 p.
PEREIRA, Clevisson Junior. Geografia da Religião: Um olhar panorâmico. 2013. RA´E GA, Curitiba, v 27, 2013. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpr.br/raega/article/download/30414/19689. Acesso em: 30 dez. 2018.
PEREIRA, Pilato. Justiça e paz com a criação: a ecologia em interação com justiça e paz na experiência prática e reflexiva do Conselho Mundial de Igrejas. Dissertação. Faculdade de Teologia, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, 2012. Disponível em: http://repositorio.pucrs.br/dspace/handle/10923/5256. Acesso em: 30 dez. 2018.
PORTO, Marcelo Firpo de Souza; ROCHA, Diogo Ferreira da; FINAMORE, Renan. Saúde coletiva, território e conflitos ambientais: bases para um enfoque socioambiental crítico. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 19, n. 10, Oct. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v19n10/1413-8123-csc-19-10-4071.pdf. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2018.
REIMER, Haroldo. Crise Ecológica: Uma Visita de Deus. Estudos Teológicos, São Leopoldo, v. 3, n. 32, p.226-239, 1992. Disponível em: http://ism.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/estudos_teologicos/article/download/975/944. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
