Comportamento da Temperatura do Lixo em duas Épocas Distintas (seca e chuvosa) no Lixão da Cidade de Maceió, AL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9906Abstract
Maceió city, due to the inexistence of industry pollutants, detainsits landfill, located in Cruz das Almas neighborhood (LAT 09º 33’ S; LON35º 46’ W) as one of the main atmospheric pollutants source emission.
There are two great reasons to the inhabitant claims that live near the landfill.The leached ashes resulted from the waste combustion, mainly during thedry period in the region (October, November, December and January),and the gas emission produced by the waste bacteria and chemical activity,that occurs during all the year, being most noted by the surroundingpopulation in the rainy period. (April, May, June and July). The main aimof this paper is to analyzer the waste temperature profile, in twoclimatologically distinct period (dry and wet seasons) in the landfill. To doit, three field experiments were carried out with an automatic weather stationinstallation (EMA), to solar global radiation, precipitation and wastetemperature soil profile in four different levels (5, 25, 50 and 100 cm) beingtwo fields campaigns in the dry season and another in wet period. Couldnote that the waste temperature (TL) varies according to the season,emphasizing the dry period, where the waste temperature is highest in thelevel near surface, while in the wet period occurs the opposite. Was notedthat the precipitation substandard the waste temperature profile.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
