Multipenalty and composed merit functions in Tikhonov-type regularization applied to atmospheric source identification problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86857Keywords:
Inverse problems, Tikhonov-type regularization, Multipenalt, Composed merit functionsAbstract
We propose a technique to simplify the minimization of the objective function arising in Tikhonov-type regularization when there are multiple observations, like multiphysics identification problems, and multiple penalty terms. It breaks the original problem into two or more minimizations that are performed sequentially and recursively. In this preliminary work, we consider the case of two minimization steps. We apply the estimation technique to the identification of pollutant emission sources in the atmosphere, considering the data from the Copenhagen experiment.
Downloads
References
Albani, R. & Albani, V. (2020). An Accurate Strategy to Retrieve Multiple Source Emissions in the Atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 233, 117579.
Albani, R, Albani, V, & Silva Neto, A. (2020). Source characterization of airborne pollutant emissions by hybrid metaheuristic/gradient-based optimization techniques. Environ Pollut., 267, 115618.
Albani, V, De Cezaro, A. & Zubelli, J. (2016). On the Choice of the Tikhonov Regularization Parameter and the Discretization Level: A Discrepancy-Based Strategy. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 10(1), 1–25.
Albani, V, De Cezaro, A, & Zubelli, J. (2017). Convex Regularization of Local Volatility Estimation. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 20(1), 1750006.
Albani, V. & Zubelli, J. (2020). A Splitting Strategy for the Calibration of Jump-Diffusion Models. Finance and Stochastics, 24, 677–722.
Anzengruber, S. & Ramlau, R. (2010). Morozov’s discrepancy principle for Tikhonov-type functionals with nonlinear operators. Inverse Problems, 26 (2).
Arya, S. P. (2001). Introduction to Micrometeorology. Academic Press.
Gryning, S. E. (1981). Elevated source SF6 - tracer dispersion experiments in the Copenhagen area. Technical report, Risø-R-446, Risø
Nacional Laboratory, 187 pp.
Gryning, S. E. & Lyck, E. (1984). Atmospheric Dispersion from Elevated Sources in Urban Area: Comparison Between Tracer and Experiments and the Model Calculations. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 23, 651–660.
Gryning, S. E. & Lyck, E. (2002). The Copenhagen tracer experiments: Reporting of measurements. Technical Report 1054, Technical University from Denmark, Denmark. Forskningscenter Risoe.
Hughes, T., Franca, L., and Hulbert, G. (1989). A new Finite Element Formulation for Computational Fluid Dynamics: VIII. The Galerkin/Least-Square Method for AdvectiveDiffusive Equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 73, 173–189.
Morozov, V. (1966). On the solution of functional equations by the method of regularization. Dokl. Math., 7, 414–417.
Scherzer, O, Grasmair, M, Grossauer, H, Haltmeier, M, & Lenzen, F. (2008). Variational Methods in Imaging, volume 167 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York.
Ulke, A. G. (2000). New turbulent parameterization for a dispersion model in the atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos. Environ., 34, 1029–1042.
Vogel, C. (2002). Computational methods for inverse problems, volume 23. SIAM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
