Multi-objective optimization of vibrating particle systems applied to engineering system design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86556Keywords:
Engineering system design, Vibrating particles system algorithm, Heuristic optimization, Multi-objective optimizationAbstract
The design of systems constitutes one of the most important pillars in engineering, in which it is desired to reduce costs, minimize time and resources, and guarantee the quality, efficiency, and safety of products. In recent decades, numerous population-based algorithms have been employed for this purpose. Among these, we can cite a new heuristic approach, the Vibrating Particles System (VPS) algorithm. This is based on simulating the free vibration of systems with one degree of freedom and viscous damping. The present work aims to extend the VPS to a multi-objective context. The results obtained considering two engineering design problems demonstrate that the proposed methodology was able to obtain good performance in terms of convergence and computational cost.
Downloads
References
Andrade, J. C., Lobato, F. S. (2023). Engineering System Design using the Vibrating Particles System Algorithm. Ciência E Natura, 45(esp. 3), e74073.
Castro, R. E. (2001). Otimização de Estruturas com multi-objetivo via Algoritmos Genéticos de Pareto, Tese de Doutorado, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, COPPE/UFRJ.
Coello, C., Pulido, G., & Lechuga, M. (2004). Handling Multiple Objectives with Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8(3), 256-279.
Deb, K. (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester (England): John Wiley & Sons.
Kaveh, A. (2017). Vibrating particles system algorithm. In: Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures. Switzerland: Springer, 511-539.
Kaveh, A., & Ghazaan, M. I. (2017). Vibrating particles system algorithm for truss optimization with multiple natural frequency constraints. Acta Mechanica, Springer, 228(1), 307-322.
Kaveh, A., & Vazirinia, Y. (2017). Tower Cranes and Supply Points Locating Problem using CBO, ECBO, and VPS. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 7, 393-411.
Kaveh, A., & Jafarpour, D. (2017). Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Walls using CBO, ECBO and VPS Algorithms. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 18, 657-671, 2017.
Lobato, F. S. (2008). Otimização multi-objetivo para o projeto de sistemas de engenharia. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Mecânica) –
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia.
Ravindran, A., Ragsdell, K. M., & Reklaitis, G. V. (2009). Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications, 2 ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997). No Free Lunch Theorems for Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 67-82.
Vanderplaats, G. N. (1999). Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design. USA: Vanderplaats Research & Development Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.