Flux of methane from the soil in area of forest and pasture in West Pará
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X80259Keywords:
Greenhouse effect, Sink, EmissionAbstract
In the Amazon region studies on greenhouse gases are still carried out with low frequency, so understanding the dynamics and flow of these gases in the region is of great importance. Among these gases is methane, which is the second most concentrated greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. In this context, the objective of this study was to quantify the methane fluxes in primary forest and pasture areas and analyze the seasonal variability of the emission/absorption of this gas, as well as to verify the influence of environmental factors acting on the behavior of methane. The study region was the Municipality of Belterra, Western Pará. To measure the methane fluxes in the soil, static chambers were used with the aid of a greenhouse gas analyzer (Los Gatos Research (LGR-915-0011). The methane flux in the soil in the Flona region averaged -1,499 ± 1.3 mg CH₄ m−2 d−1 and an average of -0.4776 ± 1.21 mg CH₄ m−2 d−1 for the pasture area, positive and negative values were obtained for the different areas, indicating emission and consumption of methane, respectively, in the studied period.
Downloads
References
FEARNSIDE, P.M. Emissões de gases de efeito estufa Oriundas das mudanças do uso da terra na Amazônia Brasileira. In 7ª reunião Especial da SBPC: Amazônia no Brasil e no Mundo, Manaus-Amazonas, 25-27 de abril de 2001. SBPC, São Paulo. 2001.
FELIPPE, M. T. S. Estudo de Fluxo de Óxido Nitroso (N2O) regional na Bacia Amazônica. 2010. 165 p. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências). Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, 2010.
FURTADO NETO, A. T.o; MOURA, J. M. S.; SILVA, R.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C.; GATTI, L. V.i; RÖCKMANN, T. Produção e Fluxo de Metano na Floresta Nacional do Tapajós. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, São Paulo, v. 34, n. 4, p. 585-596, dez. 2019.
GOLDENFUM, J. A. (Ed.). GHG Measurement Guidelines for Freshwater Reservoirs: Derived From: The UNESCO/IHA Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Freshwater Reservoirs Research Project. International Hydropower Association (IHA), 2010.
KELLER, M.; REINERS, W. A. Soil-atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide, nitric oxide, and methane under secondary succession of pasture to forest in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Kent, Ohio, v. 8, n. 4, p. 399-409, dez. 1994.
KNITTEL K., BOÉTIUS A. Anaerobic oxidation of methane: progress with an unknown process. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. Bethesda, v. 63, p. 311-334. 2009.
MALHI, Y.; PHILLIPS, O. L. Tropical forests and global atmospheric change: a synthesis. Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society Of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, v. 359, n. 1443, p. 549-555, mar. 2004.
MOJEREMANE, W. Factors influencing methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from soils: a review. International Journal of Forest, Soil & Erosion, v. 3, n. 3, p. 104-112, 2013.
MOURA, J.M.S. Fontes de metano em florestas tropicais da Amazônia: Análise da composição isotópica e uso de técnicas indiretas para determinação de balanços gasosos nesses ecossistemas. 2010. 108 p. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências). Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 2010.
MYHRE, G.; SHINDELL, D.; BRÉON, F. M.; COLLINS, W.; FUGLESTVEDT, J.; HUANG, J.; KOCH, D.; LAMARQUE, J. F.; LEE, D.; MENDOZA, B.; NAKAJIMA, T.; ROBOCK, A.; STEPHENS, G.; TAKEMURA, T.; AND ZHANG, H. 2013: Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. T.F. STOCKER, D. QIN, G.-K. PLATTNER, M. TIGNOR, S.K. ALLEN, J. DOSCHUNG, A. NAUELS, Y. XIA, V. BEX, AND P.M. MIDGLEY, Eds., Cambridge University Press, pp. 659-740, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018.
SANTOS, F. C. Trocas gasosas de CH4 e N2O entre solo e atmosfera em diferentes tipos de cobertura nos municípios de Belterra e Santarém, Pará. 2012. 46 p. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Naturais da Amazônia, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Santarém, Pará, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.