A mathematical approach for predicting the consolidation of saturated clays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X66836Keywords:
Consolidation, Viscosity, Non-linearity, Saturated clayAbstract
The saturated clay layers subjected to a vertical load undergo vertical deformations over time, that is, consolidation. These deformations, when accentuated, cause structural, functional or aesthetic damage to buildings. In this sense, here a mathematicalmodel is proposed and developed to predict the consolidation of saturated clays taking into account the concepts presented by Terzaghi e Frohlich (1936), Taylor (1942) e Barden (1965). The mathematical formulation considers the existence of a viscous portion of the effective vertical tension and incorporates in the modeled partial differential equation a non-linear viscosity lawas a fundamental property. This consolidation equation is obtained in terms of dissipating excess normalized poropressure. Inview of the complexity of the model, the numerical technique of finite divided differences is used to obtain the theoretical solution considering variations in time and space. The numerical solution shows that the viscous portion of the effective vertical tension acts by slowing down the phenomenon of consolidation. Furthermore, the adjustment of theoretical to experimental values shows that the modeling for the viscosity factor equal to one is more promising than the proposals by Terzaghi e Frohlich (1936) and Andrade (2014).
Downloads
References
ANDRADE, M. E. S. (2014). Adensamento unidimensional considerando a resistência viscosa à compressão. PhD dissertation,Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
BARDEN, L. (1965). Consolidation of clay with non-linear viscosity. Géotechnique, 15(4), 345–362.
BRAJA, M. (2011). Fundamentos de Engenharia Geotécnica, 6º edn. Cengage Learning.
CARVALHO, S. R. L. (1997). Uma teoria de adensamento com compressão secundária. PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal doRio de Janeiro.
TAYLOR, D. W. (1942). Research on Consolidation of Clays, 1º edn. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
TERZAGHI, K., FROHLICH, O. K.(1936). Theorie der Setzung von Tonschichten, 1º edn. Franz Deuticke.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.