Data assimilation for nowcasting in the terminal area of Rio de Janeiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X53224Keywords:
Data assimilation, WRF, 3D-Var, Surface data, Profile dataAbstract
The process of data assimilation, in which meteorological observations and weather forecasts are merged to provide an analysis field, has been largely studied by the scientific community and operational centers. The 3D-Variational (3D-Var) approach available in the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) computer model is evaluated for data assimilation for the Terminal Control Area of Rio de Janeiro (TCA-RJ). The basic goal of any variational data assimilation system is to produce an optimal estimate of the atmospheric state at analysis time. The analysis field is estimated from a first guess (previous forecast) and an observation field, weighted by the error matrices. The WRF is designed for nowcasting (forecasts up to 6h) for the TCA-RJ through assimilation cycles using surface, sounding, and wind profile data. The preliminary results show the model sensibility for each observation type and encourage the use of this technique operationally for the support of the air traffic management controlled by the Brazilian Air Force.
Downloads
References
BARKER, D. M., W. HUANG, Y.-R. GUO, A. BOURGEOIS, AND X. N. XIAO. A Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System for MM5: Implementation and Initial Results. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 897–914, 2004.
BARKER, D. M., X.-Y. HUANG, Z. LIU, T. AULIGNE, X. ZHANG, S. RUGG, A. A. AL KATHERI, A. BOURGEIOS, J. BRAY, Y. CHEN, M. DEMIRTAS, Y. GUO, T. HENDERSON, W. HUANG, H.-C. LIN, J. MICHALAKES, S. RIZVI, X.-Y. ZHANG. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model’s Community Variational/Ensemble Data Assimilation System: WRFDA. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 831–843, 2012.
CINTRA, R.S., CAMPOS VELHO, H. F. Global Data Assimilation Using Artificial Neural Networks In Speedy Model. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Modeling, 2012.
DALEY, R. Atmospheric data analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
DUDHIA, J. Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two–dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077–3107, 1989.
GRELL, G. A. AND FREITAS, S. R. A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5233-5250, 2014.
HONG, SONG–YOU, JIMY DUDHIA, AND SHU–HUA CHEN. A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. 2004. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 103–120, 2004.
HONG, SONG–YOU, YIGN NOH, JIMY DUDHIA. A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318–2341, 2006.
KALNAY, E. Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
MLAWER, ELI. J., STEVEN. J. TAUBMAN, PATRICK. D. BROWN, M. J. IACONO, AND S. A. CLOUGH. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated–k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682, 1997.
SKAMAROCK, W. C., J. B. KLEMP, J. DUDHIA, D. O. GILL, Z. LIU, J. BERNER, W. WANG, J. G. POWERS, M. G. DUDA, D. M. BARKER, AND X.-Y. HUANG. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 4. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-556+STR, 145 pp, 2019.
TEWARI, M., F. CHEN, W. WANG, J. DUDHIA, M. A. LEMONE, K. MITCHELL, M. EK, G. GAYNO, J. WEGIEL, AND R. H. CUENCA. Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in the WRF model. 20th conference on weather analysis and forecasting/16th conference on numerical weather prediction, pp. 11–15, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.