Musculoskeletal symptoms in professional musicians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41094Keywords:
Musculoskeletal pain, Musicians, InjuriesAbstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence and severity of musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms in the trunk and upper limbs of keyboardists. Cross-sectional study, including volunteers of both genders, aged 18-40 years, who practiced for at least 2 years, excluding those with systemic diseases, were assessed for MS pain using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. The χ-squared test was used for statistical analysis and a significance level of 5% was adopted. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ceuma University (opinion nº 2,627,609). Thirty-nine volunteers were evaluated, and all reported experiencing pain or discomfort. The regions of greatest complaint of chronic pain/discomfort were the thoracic and lumbar spine (n = 27 ,69.24%; p <0.05) and wrist/hand (n = 23.58.9%). The highest acute complaint was in the lumbar spine (n = 12, 30.76%; p <0.05), and in the wrist/hand (n = 9, 23.07%). A severity index of 1 was the most frequent (n = 14, 36%). It can be concluded that keyboardists have MS mainly in the spine, wrist, and hands, although the severity of the symptoms is mild; the high frequency of complaints suggests the importance of prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal symptoms before aggravation.Downloads
References
ABREU AL, CARVALHO FRTS, SOARES CBVK, et al. Frequency of pain musculoskeletal in transportation professionals public. São Luis-MA. Rev. Investig. Bioméd.2016;8: 30-10,.
ARAÚJO NCK, CARDIA MCG. A presença de vícios posturais durante a execução do violino. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE BIOMECÂNICA, 10., 2005, João Pessoa. Anais. João Pessoa: Sociedade Brasileira de Biomecânica, 2005.
BADARÓ VFA, GUILHEM D. Perfil sociodemográfico e profissional de fisioterapeutas e origem das suas concepções sobre ética. Fisioter. Mov.2011;24(3):445-9.
BRANCO J, SILVA F, JANSEN K, et al. Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the faculty of public schools and the private school. Fisioter Mov.2011;24:307-7.
BRAGATTO MM. Dor cervical crônica e postura em trabalhadores de escritório usuários de computador. Dissertação (Mestrado em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional) Ribeirão Preto: USP, 2015.
BRON C, DOMMERHOLT, Jd. Etiolog of myofascial trigger points. Curr Pain Headache.2012;16(5):439-44.
BRUCE B, FRIES JF, LUBECK DP. Aerobic exercise and its impact on musculoskeletal pain in older adults: a 14 year prospective, longitudinal study. Arthritis Res Ther.2005;7(6):R1263-70.
BARCZAK R, DUARTE F. Impactos ambientais da mobilidade urbana: cinco categorias de medidas mitigadoras. Rev. Bras. Gest Urbana.2012;4(1):13-19.
CARVALHO ALA, et al. Sintomas osteomusculares e desempenho ocupacional. Rev.Ter. Ocup. Univ São Paulo.2016;2(27):165-71.
CASSAPIAN MR, PELLENZ CCO. Doenças ocupacionais e sua prevenção em estudante de música – Realidade de uma Instituição de Ensino Superior de Curitiba. MúsicaHobie.2010;10(2):91- 16.
COSTA, C. Dor musculoesquelética. Availablefrom: < http://www.sbed.org.br/home. php> Acesso 13 de março de 2018.
COSTA CP, ABRAHÃO JI. Quando o tocar dói: um olhar ergonômico sobre o fazer musical. Per Musi: Rev Acadêmica Música.2004;(10):102.
FASSA AG, FACCHINI LA, BREITENBACH F. Prevalência de hipertensão arterial entre motoristas de ônibus em Santa Maria. RBSO.2008; 33(118):32-7.
FERNANDES M, ROCHA VM, OLIVEIRA AGC. Fatores associados à prevalência de sintomas osteomusculares em professores. Rev Salud Pública.2009;11(2):256-11.
FERREIRA GD. Prevalence and associated factors of back pain in adults from southern Brazil: population-based study. Rev Bras Fisioter.2011;15(1):31-6.
FLECKENSTEIN J, ZAPS D, RUGGERLJ, et al. Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pa in syndrome: results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2010:11-21.
LAVELLE, Myofascial trigger points. Anesthesiol Clin.2007;25(4):841-51.
LIMA J, SIMONELLI PA. Análise ergonômica da atividade dos músicos da Orquestra Sinfônica do Paraná: fatores de risco e cargas de trabalho. Cad. Ter. Ocup. UFSCar.2014;22(1)85-10.
LOURENÇO GMG, SILVA FJS. Prevalência de distúrbios posturais entre tecladistas e a atuação preventiva e corretiva da fisioterapia. Revista NovaFisio.2014;XVIII:66-6,.
MACIEL MN. Dor cervical e qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde: estudo de base populacional. Dissertação (Mestrado em fisioterapia na saúde funcional) Bauru: Universidade do Sagrado Coração,2017.
MANGO MSM. et al. Análise dos sintomas osteo-musculares de professores do ensino fundamental em Matinhos (PR). Fisioter. Mov.2012;25(4):785-9,.
PINHEIRO FA. et al. Validação do Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares como medida de morbidade. Rev Saúde Pública.2002;36(3)307-12.
REIJANI N, BENETTI AF. Principais queixas osteomusculares em músicos da região do ABC paulista: um estudo de prevalência. ABCS HEALTH SCIENCES.2015;41(1):40-5.
ROSSI AM, QUICK JC, PERREWÉ PL. Stress e qualidade de vida no trabalho: o positivo e o negativo. Atlas, 2009:225-30.
SILVA AG, LÃ FM, AFREIXO, V. Pain prevalence in instrumental musicians: a systematic review. MedProblPerformArt, 2015.
SILVA CS, BATISTA JC, CRUZ RI et al. Musico e o superuso dos músculos esqueléticos. Coleção Pesquisa em Educação Física.2012;11(3):1981-4313.
STUPP L, RESENDE AP, PETRICELLI CD et al. Pelvic floor muscle and transversus abdominis activation in abdominal hypopressive technique through surface electromyography. Neurourol Urodyn.2011;30(8)1518-21.
SUSKI E, SCHACHTER E, KOLCIC I et al. Health problems in musicians – a review. Acta Dermatovenerol.2005;13:247-51.
TRELHA CS et al. Arte e Saúde: frequência de sintomas musculoesqueléticos em músicos de Orquestra Sinfônica da Universidade Estadual de Londrina. In: Seminário: Ciências Biológicas e Saúde.2004;25:65-7.
WOELLNER SS, MARQUES D, KIENEN ML. Distonia focal da mão em músicos: implicações para a reabilitação. ArquivosCatarinenses de Medicina (Online).2013;42:82.
WU SJ. Occupational risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in musicians: a systematic review. MedProblPerform Art.2007;22:43-8.
Published
Versions
- 2022-06-21 (2)
- 2020-12-31 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
