Application of the Peltier-Seebeck effect for termical-electrical energy conversion as source for mobile device charging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40858Keywords:
Renewable energy, Applied Physics to engineering, Peltier EffectAbstract
This work states a viable option, using low-cost components and renewable energy, of building a phone charger with main source of energy from the difference of temperature between a human body and a heat sink, free of wires and/or external connectors. Using the Peltier-Seeback effect, to produce a potential difference from the broker junction in different heats, stabilizing and amplifying this with a circuit composed by simple components and of easy access, getting as the circuit output the average values of 5,02 V and 1.1A Such values may be taken in consideration as enough to recharge a smartphone battery, which the output values vary between 3.3V-5V and 0.7A-2A. This way, this shown study demonstrates the application of a thermal-physical effect on a common accessory of daily use, using as intermission the basic concept of engineering in what it refers to solving problems. Therefore, on electric energy shortage situations in remote places without electricity, there will be new search fronts, academic or not, that might be used as a broad way to allow the energy supply in home appliances of high tension, bringing energy supply to remote areas of any origin and contributing to the development of research on this area.Downloads
References
MACDONALD, D. K. C. Thermoelectricity: An Introduction to the Principles. 1. ed. NewYork: Dover Publications. 2006.
DUTRA, F. A história do telefone celular como distinção social no Brasil. Da elite empresarial ao consumo da classe popular. Revista Brasileira de História da Mídia. (Vol. 05 – Nº02. Jul/Dez. 2016.
HOFFMAN, C. Why Is Smartphone Battery Life Still So Bad?. How-ToGeek. Informatic. 22 sep. 2016. Available in: <https://goo.gl/n4foMx>. Access in 12 jul. 2017. São Paulo, Brazil.
CEKDIN, C. The usage of thermoelectric generator as a renewable energy source. TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication, Computing, Electronics and Control. Vol. 18, No. 4, August 2020.
MOURA, J. A. S. Filmes nanométricos de fen e aln crescidos por sputtering e aplicações do efeito Peltier. 131f. Tese (Doutorado em programa de pós-graduação em Física) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal-RN, Brazil, 2010.
FEYNMAN, R.P. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. 2. ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley. 1964.
PISCHKEA E. From Kyoto to Paris: Measuring renewable energy policy regimes in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the United States. Energy Research & Social Science Volume 50, 2019.
KUMAR, S. Thermal Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Peltier Module. Renewable Energy and its Innovative Technologies. 2018.
SPRY, M. RETHINKING THERMOELECTRIC EFFECTS IN SEEBECK AND PELTIER ELEMENTS. 2. ed. USA: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform. 2013.
REIS, M.S. Implementação de um Regulador de Tensão com Comutador Eletrônico de Tap. Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ/COPPE, 2013.
SCI LLC. Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC. MC7800, MC7800A, MC7800AE, NCV7800 Datasheet. Available in: <https://goo.gl/mH7SvX> Access in 5 aug. 2016. Colorado, USA, 2014.
INCB. Instituto Newton C. Braga. Como funcionam os carregadores de baterias. Eletronic. 2010. Available in: <https://goo.gl/eXQNdL>. Access in 9 sep. 2016. São Paulo, Brazil.
WANG, X. Direct thermal charging cell for converting low-grade heat to electricity. Nat Commun 10, 4151. 2019.
OGIN, G. How much heat per hour do humans dissipate?. PhysLink. Physics. 2011. Available in: https://goo.gl/Xe8PGx>. Acces in 23 aug. 2016. New York, USA.
GOLDSMID, J. Physics of Thermoelectric Energy Conversion (Iop Concise Physics). 1. e.d. USA: IOP Concise Physics. 2017.
WIDLAR, R. (1971). New Devopments in IC Voltage Regulators. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, VOL. SC-6 NO 1. (FEBRUARY 1971). New York, USA, 1971.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.