Climate justice: a new way of looking at environmental issues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X38599Keywords:
Justiça climática, Mudanças climática, Adaptação às mudanças climáticasAbstract
Climate change is a concerning topic, as it is impossible to deny its damaging effects on the planet. Different policy responses have been offered regarding climate change adaptation, and these have brought forward issues related to climate justice. As this topic is still not very well known in Brazil, this paper aims to raise awareness on climate justice concepts and related issues. This is a literature review which analyses climate justice theories and their relation with the concept of climate change adaptation in order to offer a new point-of-view on the topic. This paper has come to the conclusion that the concept of climate change has been created due to the increased importance of climate justice. Its origins lie in climate change activism, which seeks to help the most affected communities. That was when the fight for sharing the burden of climate change emerged, giving rise to the concepts of mitigation and climate adaptation. Thus, the most affected populations should receive assistance in the form of climate change impact adaptation, financed by the countries which are responsible for most greenhouse effect gas emissions, in name of climate justice.
Downloads
References
ALVES MWFM, MARIANO EB. Liberdade como garantia de justiça climática: o papel do indivíduo em economia de baixo carbono. In: XXIV Simpósio de Engenharia de Produção. [Internet]; 2017 nov. 8-10, Bauru (SP), Brasil. p.1-11. [cited 2019 Mar 09]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2KH9Png
BARRET S. Local level climate justice? Adaptation finance and vulnerability reduction. Global Environ Chang. 2013; 23:1819-1829.
BARZOTTO LF. Justiça Social - Gênese, estrutura e aplicação de um conceito. Rev. Jurídica Virtual. 2003;5(48):1-21.
BOND P. Politics of climate justice. Paralysis above, movement below. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2012.
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Conferência das Partes – COP. [cited 2019 Mar 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2H7e88w.
BÜCHS M, BARDSLEY N, DUWE S. Who bears the brunt? distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies. Crit. Soc. Policy; 2011;31:285-307.
BULKELEY HA, CARMIN JA, BROTO VC, EDWARDS GAS, FULLER S. Climate justice and global cities: mapping the emerging discourses. Global Environ Chang. 2013;23(5):914-925.
BURKETT M. Just solutions to climate change: a climate justice proposal for a domestic clean development mechanism. Buff. L. Rev. 2008;56:169-243.
BUTZKE L, THIBES M. Manifesto por justiça climática: interface entre velhos e novos problemas socioambientais no sul de Santa Catarina. In: V Encontro de Economia Catarinense - Crescimento e Sustentabilidade. Área Temática 1 – Desenvolvimento Econômico e Meio Ambiente - UDESC/ESAG. [Internet]; 2011 abr. 28-29, Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.p.1-24. [cited 2019 Mar 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2UZ3wiN
CALZADILLA PV. Climate justice: case studies in global and regional governance challenges (Environmental Law Institute Washington DC 2016). PER. 2017;20(1):1-8.
CAMERON E, SHINE T, BEVINS W. Climate justice: equity and justice informing a new climate agreement. Working Paper – Mary Robinson Foundation, 2013. [cited 2019 Mar 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2X8tT34
CANEY S. To kinds of climate justice: avoiding harm and sharing burdens. J. Political Philos. 2014;22(2):125-149.
CHATTERTON P, FEATHERSTONE D, ROUTLEDGE P. Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: antagonism, the commons, and solidarity. Antipode. 2013;45(3):602-620.
ELLIOT D, COOK LF. Climate justice and the use of human rights law in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office, 2016. [cited 2019 Mar 09]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2bWfBQB
FERGUSON MR. Native youth contributions to indigenous sovereignty and climate justice in the #noDAPL Movement. Honors Theses. 2018;256. [cited 2019 Mar 12]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2UG1VyU
FISHER S. The emerging geographies of climate justice. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy - Working Paper n.94 / Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment - Working Paper n.83, 2012. [cited 2019 Mar 12]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2UZ6rIh
FORSYTH T. Climate justice is not just ice. Geoforum. 2014;54:230-232.
GOODMAN J. From global justice to climate justice? Justice ecologism in an era of global warming, New Political Science. 2009.31(4):499-514.
HAYWARD T. Human rights versus emissions rights: Climate justice and the equitable distribution of ecological space. Ethics Int. 2007;21:431-450.
HERRMANN MLP. Atlas de desastres naturais do Estado de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis: IOESC, 2006.
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. AR4 Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2007. [cited 2019 Mar 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2Myo4rS
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: a special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: IPCC, 2012. [cited 2019 Mar 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2ZdFaBe
LEVY BS, PATZ JA. Climate change, human rights, and social justice. Annals of Global Health. 2015;81(3):310-322.
LIMA EF. Injustiça climática e povos autóctones. In: PERALTA CE, ALVARENGA LJ, AUGUSTIN S. Direito e justiça ambiental: diálogos interdisciplinares sobre a crise ecológica. Caxias do Sul: Educs, 2014. p.121-138.
ONU – Organização das Nações Unidas – Brasil. Relatório da ONU alerta para aumento dramático das perdas econômicas provocadas por desastres. ONU, 2018. [cited 2019 Mar 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2QJAZbf
PIELKE RA. Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy. Global Environ Chang. 1998;8(2):159-170.
SCHLOSBERG D, COLLINS LB. From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Clim Change. 2014;5(3):359-374.
SMIT B, BURTON I, KLEIN R JT, STREET R. The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 1999;4(3-4):199-213.
TEIXEIRA IMV. Prefácio. In: BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Secretaria de Articulação Institucional e Cidadania Ambiental, Departamento de Educação Ambiental. Educação ambiental & mudanças climáticas, diálogo necessário num mundo em transição. Parâmetros e diretrizes para a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental no contexto das mudanças climáticas causadas pela ação humana. [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2013. p.3. [cited 2019 Mar 09]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2ZdErQr
TOKAR B. Movements for climate justice in the US and worldwide. In: Dietz M, Garrelts H. Routledge handbook of the climate change movement. New York: Routledge, 2013. p.131-146.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-18 (2)
- 2019-10-29 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
