Thunderstorm dynamics in a scale interaction
AbstractThis paper presents a review of thunderstorm dynamics through the use of the vorticity equation with a focus on the development of rotation, an indicator of storm severity. The processes involved in the scale interaction are basically the tilting of vortex tubes while the divergence (or ballerina) term, being highly non-linear, provides intensification of incipient vorticity. A brief account of numerically simulated storms in Brazil with well defined wind shear in the storm environment is presented.
Browning, K.A., 1986: Morphology and classification 01 middle-Iatitude thunderstorm. In: Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics. E. Kessler, Ed.., University of Oklahoma Press, 133-152.
Byers, H. R. and R. R. Braham, 1949: The thunderstorm. U.S. Department of Commerce, 287 pp.
Cohen, J. C. P., M. A. F. Silva Dias e C. A. Nobre, 1995: Environmental conditions associated with Amazonian squall lines: a case study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123,3163-3174
Cohen, J.C.P. and M.A.F.Silva Dias, 1997: Numerical simulation of the structure of Amazonian squall lines and comparison with ABLE 2B data. Filth International Conference on Southern Hemisphere Meteorology and Oceanography, 7-11 Abril, 1997, Pretoria, South Africa, Preprints, 51-52.
Davies-Jones, R. P., 1984: Streamwise vorticity: the origin of updraft rotation in supercell storms. J. Almos. Sci., 41, 2991-3006.
Davies-Jones, R., CA Doswell, H.E. Brooks, 1994: Comments on initiation and evolution of updraft rotation within an incipient supercell thuderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 51,326-331.
Lilly, D.K., 1990: Numerical prediction of thunderstorms - has its time come? Quart. J. Roy. Mel. Soc., 116,779-798.
Fujita, T., 1981: Tornadoes and downbursts in the context of generalized planetary scales. J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1511-1534.
Holton, J.R., 1992: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology, 3rd Ed. Academic Press, 511pp.
Houze Jr., R. A., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.
Klemp, J. B. 1987: Dynamics 01 tornadic thunderstorms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 19, 369-402.
Lemon L.R. and CA Doswell 111, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocycione structure as related to tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106,48-61.
Ludlam, F. H., 1963: Severe Local Storms: a review. Meteorol. Monogr., 5 (27),30 pp.
Orlanski, 1., 1975: A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes. BulI. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 56, 527-530.
Rotunno, R. and J.B. Klemp, 1982: The influence of shear-induced pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 135-151.
Rotunno, R. and J. B. Klemp, 1985: On the rotation and propagation of simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sei., 42, 271-292.
Silva Dias, MAF., 1987: Sistemas de mesoescala e previsão de tempo a curto prazo. Rev. Bras. Meteor., 2, 133-150.
Silva Dias, M.F., 1989: Mesoscale Meteorology - South American Phenomena. In: Mesoscale Forecasting and its Applications – Lectures presented at the fortieth session of the WMO Executive Council, WMO - No. 712, pp. 21-47.
Silva Dias, MAF., 1999: Storms in Brazil. In: Hazards and Disasters Series, Storms Volume II, R. Pielke Sr. , R. Pielke Jr., Eds., Routiedge. pp.207-219.
Menezes, W. F. and M. A. F. Silva Dias, 1996: Numerical simulation of a severe storm embedded in large scale and mesoscale cyclonic environment. (In Portuguese). IX Brazilian Meteorological Congresso Campos do Jordão, 6 - 13 Novembro 1996, Proceedings, vol 2, 1312-1316.
Menezes, W. F., MAF. Silva Dias, 1998 a: Numerical simulation of the storms in the sate of Sao Paulo in 14 May 1994: the Ribeirão Preto case. (In Portuguese). X Brazilian Meteorological Congress and First Brazilian Workshop on Mesoscale Meteorology, Brasília, 26 a 30 October 1998, Proceedings in CD-ROM available in the Brazilian Meteorological Society.
Menezes, W. F., MAF. Silva Dias, 1998 b: Numerical simulation of the Itu and Ribeirão Preto cases: comparison between storms embedded in different environmental wind shear. (in Portuguese). X Brazilian Meteorological Congress and First Brazilian Workshop on Mesoscale Meteorology, Brasília, 26 a 30 October 1998, Proceedings in CD-ROM available in the Brazilian Meteorological Society.
Weisman, M. L. and J. B. Klemp, 1986: Characteristics of isolated convective storms. In: Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting, P.S. Ray, Ed. American Meteorological Society, 331-358.
Sui, C.-H., M. Yanai, 1986: Cumulus emsemble effects on the large scale vorticity and momentum fields of GATE. Part I. Observational evidence. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 465-472.
How to Cite
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.