A fuzzy rule-based system to characterize the profile of an investor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X32880Keywords:
Classification of the profile of an investor, Fuzzy rules, MatlabAbstract
In this work is proposed a fuzzy rule-based system in order to classify the profile of an investor. For this purpose, it is used the plataform GUIDE from MATLAB to build an interactive graphic interface, where the investor answers five questions (which are based on the ANBIMA model) which deal with his/her finances. Once the system has these answers, it presents as output one of the following classifications: conservative investor, moderate investor or bold investor. The system also indicates a suggestion of potentials types of investments that suits better based on the output provided by the system. The results are compared to the ones obtained by the AIP from the Banco Paulista.
Downloads
References
Banco Paulista (2016). Questionário API. Banco Paulista, URL https://www.bancopaulista.com.br/Arquivos/
QuestionarioAPI.pdf.
Barros, L. C., Bassanezi, R. C. (2006). Tópicos de lógica fuzzy e biomatemática. Grupo de Biomatem´ tica, Instituto de Matemática, Estatística e Computação Científica (IMECC), Campinas.
Bellucci, D. P., Brandão, A. J. V. (2010). Análise de características empreendedoras utilizando sistemas baseados em regras fuzzy. Tendências em Matemática Aplicada, 11, 133–140.
Cichini, F. A. L. (2009). Aplicação de um sistema de inferência fuzzy de suporte á decisão para estimação de valores de ações
cotadas na bolsa de valores de são paulo. Dissertação de Mestrado, UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru, SP.
MathWorks Inc. (2016). Matlab 2016. MathWorks Inc., URL https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.
html.
Pedrycz, W., Gomide, F. (1998). An Introduction to Fuzzy Sets. Analysis and Design. Complex Adaptive Systems, MIT Press,
London. Portal do Investidor (2016). Tipos de investimento. URL http://www.portaldoinvestidor.gov.br.
dos Santos, L. K. C. F. R., Prata, R. A. C. (2016). Análise da malária no estado do amazonas através de sistema de base de regras fuzzy. Em: Livro de resumos do IV Congresso Brasileiro de Sistemas Fuzzy, SBMAC, vol 1, pp. 1–11.
de Sena, F. C. B. (2015). Controle fuzzy aplicado á otimização de um sistema eólico de velocidade variável. Dissertação de
Mestrado, UFERSA, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.