Modulação do estado de polimerização in vitro dos filamentos intermediários em astrócitos pela fosforilação e proteína S100B
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27235Keywords:
GFAP, S100B, protein phosphorylation, glial plasticity.Abstract
Intermediate filaments represent a major cytoskeleton constituent in eukaryotic cells. GFAP ("glial fibrillary acidic protein") is the monomer of these filaments in astrocytes and its polymerization is apparently modulated by phosphorylation and by interaction with S100B, a calcium-binding protein. In this study we investigate in vitro polymerization of GFAP, using an assay based on imidazol/high magnesium-induced sedimentation. In fact, soluble GFAP (nonpolymerized) increased about 25% in presence of S100B or PKA (protein kinase A). These data suggest that both mechanisms could be acting in the cycle of polymerization/depolymerization of GFAP at different times and/or conditions, therefore affecting glial plasticity.Downloads
References
ZIEGLER, D. R., INOCENTE, C. E., LEAL, R. B., RODNIGHT, R.
ANO GONÇALVES, C. A. The S100B protein inhibits phosphorylation of GFAP and vimentin in a cytoskeletal fraction from immature rat hippocampus. Neurochem. Res., 1998, 23:1259-1263.
KARL, J., TRAMONTINA, F., LENGYEL, 1., KLEIN, M., RODNIGHT, R. ANO GONÇALVES, C. A. The calcium-dependent inhibition of fibrillary acidic protein phosphorylation by S100B in primary cultures of astrocytes. J. Neurochemistry., 2001, 78 (Suppl):93.
DONATO, R. Functional roles of S100 proteins, calcium-binding proteins of the EF-hand type. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1999, 1450:191-231.
BIANCHI, R., GIAMBANCO, R. ANO DONATO, R. S100 protein,
but not calmodulin, binds to the glial fibrillary acidic protein and inhibits its polymerization in a Ca+-depencent manner. J. Biol. Chem., 1993, 268: 12669-12674.
KARL, J., GOTTFRIED, C., TRAMONTINA, F., DLJNKLEY, P., RODNIGHT, R. ANO GONÇALVES, C. A. GFAP phosphorylation
studied in digitonin-permeabilized astrocytes: standardization of conditions. Brain Res., 2000, 853:32-40.
GOTTFRIED, C., VALENTIM, L., SALBEGO, S., KARL, J.,
WOFCHUK, S. T., RODNIGHT, R. Regulation of protein
phosphorylation in astrocyte cultures by external calcium ions: specific effects on the phosphorylation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), vimentin and heat shock protein 27 (HSP27). Brain Res., 1999, 833:142-149.
HARRISON, B. C. ANO MOBLEY, P. L. Phosphorylation of glial
fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin by cytoskeletal-associated
intermediate filament protein kinase activity in astrocytes. J.
Neurochem., 1992, 58:32-327.
YANG, Z. W. ANO BADITCH, J. A. Factors modulating filament by bovine glial fibrillary acidic protein, the intermediate filament component of astroglial cells. Biochemistry, 1988, 27:7045-7050.
NAKAMURA, Y., TAKEDA, M. ANO NISHIMURA, T. Dynamics of
bovine glial fibrillary acidic protein phosphorylation. Neurosc. Lett., 1996, 205: 91-94.
NAKAMURA, Y., TAKEDA, M., ANGLlDES, K. J., TADA, K.,
HARIGUSHI, S. ANO NISHIMURA, T. Assembly, disassembly, and exchange of glial fibrillary acidic protein. Glia, 1991, 4:101-11O.
BIANCHI, R., GARBUGLlA, M., VERZINI, M., GIAMBANCO, 1.,
IVANENKOV, V. V., DIMLlCH, R. V. w., JAMIESON, JR. G. A. AND DONATO, R. S-100 (alpha and beta) binding peptide (TRTK-12) blocks S-1OO/GFAPinteraction: identification of a putative S-100 target epitope within the head domain of GFAP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1996, 1313:258-267.
RODNIGHT, R., GONÇALVES, C. A., WOFCHUK, S. T. ANO LEAL,
R. Control of the phosphorylation of the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in the immature rat hippocampus by glutamate and calcium ions: possible key facto r in astrocytic plasticity. Br. J. Med. Biol. Res., 1997, 30:325-338.
MCCLlNTOCK, K. A. ANO SHAW, G. S. A logical sequence search for S1OOBtarget proteins. Protein Sci., 2000, 9:2043-2046.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.