Icnofósseis em afloramentos do Rio Grande do Sul: nota preliminar

Authors

  • Tânia L. Dutra NESE - UNISINOS.
  • Renata G. Netto NESE - UNISINOS.
  • Carlos H. Nowatzki NESE - UNISINOS.
  • Cláudio E. Zarif Figueiredo NESE - UNISINOS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26228

Abstract

O trabalho não apresenta resumo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDREIS, R.R. 1989. Integração litoestratigráfica das sequências triássicas Sul-riograndenses e do Norte-Uruguaio. Relatório FAPERGS- Proc.1379/88. Inédito.

ANDREIS, R.R.,ROLON,A. e DUTRA,T.L. 1989. O afloramento de Cambaí Grande, uma nova interpretação. In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF CARBONIFEROUS- PERMIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY, 11 Buenos Aires, 1989. Anais... Buenos Aires.

CRIMES, T.P.1973. Trace Fossils. Sedimentology, 20 (1):119-131.

FREY, R.W. e PEMBERTON, S.G. 1984. Trace fossils facies models. In WALKER, R.G. ed. Facies Models. Canadá, Geoscience. Reprint Series 1.

LAVINA, E.L. e AZEVEDO,S.A. 1983. Geologia da Folha de Posto/ Queimado, RS. Convenio URGS-FINEP 33.82.0324.00. Instituto de Geosciencias, Porto Alegre, Mapa 2 (Relatório Interno).

LAVINA, E.L., NOWATZKI, C.H., SANTOS, M.A. e LEÃO, H.Z. 1985. Ambientes de sedimentação do Super-Grupo Tubarão na região de Caeira do Sul, RS. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia, 21:5-76

NETTO, R.G. 1987. Sobre a ocorrência de Neonereites Seilacher, 1960 no Permiano do Rio Grande do Sul. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PALEONTOLOGIA, 10, Rio de Janeiro, 1987. Anais... Rio de Janeiro, SBP, p.285-287.

NETTO, R.G. 1988. Paleoicnologia dos sedimentitos basais da Formação Rio do Rasto, no Rio Grande do Sul. Tese (Mestrado). Curso de Pós-Graduacão em Geosciências, UFRGS. Porto Alegre.

NETTO, R.G. 1989. Paleoicnologia das seqüências eólicas sotopostas à Formacão Botucatú no Rio Grande do Sul. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia, 28.31-44.

NOWATZKI, C.H., SANTOS, B.R.,SANTOS,M.A. e GONZAGA,T.D. 1983. Atlas de estruturas sedimentares Pré-Gondwânicas e Gondwânicas do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Parte II. Estruturas Sedimentares Químicas e Orgãnicas. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia, 15: 5 - 32.

PINTO, I.D. e CLOSS, D. 1967. Indice remissivo dos fósseis do Rio Grande do Sul. Iheringia, 1:3-76.

SCHNEIDER, R.L., MUHLMANN, H.,TOMMASI, E., MEDEIROS, R.A.,DAEMON, R.F. e NOGUElRA, A.A. 1974. Revisão estratigráfica da Bacia do Paraná In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE GEOLOGIA, 28, Porto Alegre,1974. Anais... ,1.,SBG,p.41-65.

SEILACHER, A.,1967. Bathymetry of Trace Fossils. Marine Geology, 5: 413-428.

ZINGANO, A.G. e CAUDURO,A.C. 1959. Afloramentos fossilíferos do Rio Grande do Sul. Boletim ICN,8:1-48.

Downloads

Published

1990-12-10

How to Cite

Dutra, T. L., Netto, R. G., Nowatzki, C. H., & Figueiredo, C. E. Z. (1990). Icnofósseis em afloramentos do Rio Grande do Sul: nota preliminar. Ciência E Natura, 12(12), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26228

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 12, N. 12, 1990

Section

Articles

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.