Estudo faciológico do Supergrupo Tubarão na região da Barrocada (Cachoeira do Sul - RS)

Authors

  • Milton Antonio A. Santos Unisinos.
  • Adail Ricardo Leister Gonçalves UFSCar, São Carlos, SP.
  • Reinaldo Lorandi UFSCar, São Carlos, SP.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26195

Abstract

O trbalho não apresenta resumo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CLIFTON, H.E. 1982. Estuarine deposits. In: Scholle, P.A. and Spearing, D. (ed.), Sandstone Depositional Environments, lst ed.,American Association of Petroleun Geologists, p. 179-189.

DOTT, R.H. & BOURGEOIS, J. 1982. Hummocky stratification: significance of its variable bedding sequences. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 93: 663-80.

GALLOWAY, W.E. & HOBDAY, D.K. 1983. Terrigeneous clastic depositional systems. New York, Springer - Verlag. 423p.

HANTZSCHEL, W. 1962. Trace fossils and problematica. In: Moore, R.C. (ed), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology – Part W, Geol. Soc. Of America. p. 177-245.

JOHNSON, H.D. 1980. Shallow siliciclastic seas. In: Reading, H. G. Sedimentary Enviroments and Facies. London, Black-Well Scientific Publications, p. 207-58.

LAVINA, E.L.; NOWATZKI, C.H.; SANTOS, M.A.A. & LEÃO, H.Z. 1985. Ambientes de sedimentação do Super-Grupo Tubarão na região de Cachoeira do Sul, R.S. São Leopoldo. Acta Geológica Leopoldensia, (21): 5-76.

LOPES, R.C.; LAVINA, E.L. & SIGNORELLI, N. 1986. Fácies sedimentares e evolução paleoambiental do Super-Grupo Tubarão na borda leste da Bacia do Paraná. Uma seção regional nos Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE GEOLOGIA, 34, Goiânia, 1986. Anais... Goiânia: SBG, v. 1, p. 206-18.

MORTON, R.A. 1981. Formation of storm deposits by wind-forced currents in the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea. Spec. Pub., Int. Assoc. Sediment., 5:385-96.

NETTO, R.G. & GONZAGA, T.D. 1985. Paleoicnologia do Grupo Guatá (Super-Grupo Tubarão) nos sedimentitos da Mina do Iruí, Cachoeira do Sul, R.S. Acta Geológica Leopoldensia, 21 :77-102.

NIO SWIE-DJIN. 1976. Marine transgressions as a factor in the formation of sandwave complexes. Geol. Mi jn., 55 (1-2) :18-40.

REINECK, H.E. & SINGH, I.B. 1980. Depositional sedimentary environments., 2nd, rev. and update ed., Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 549p.

WALKER, R.G. 1979. Shallow marine sands. In: Walker, R.G. (ed),Facies models. Geological Association of Canada, Reprint Series, Geoscience Canada, 1: 75-90.

WEIMER, R.J.; HOWARD, J.D. & LINDSAY, D.R. 1982. Tidal Flats and Associated Tidal Channels, In: Scholle, P.A. and Spearing, D. (ed), Sandstone Depositional Environments, lst ed., American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 191-245.

Downloads

Published

1990-12-10

How to Cite

Santos, M. A. A., Gonçalves, A. R. L., & Lorandi, R. (1990). Estudo faciológico do Supergrupo Tubarão na região da Barrocada (Cachoeira do Sul - RS). Ciência E Natura, 12(12), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26195

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 12, N. 12, 1990

Section

Articles

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.