Space-Time Distribution of Rainfall Anomaly Index (RAI) for the Salgado Basin, Ceará State - Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26080Keywords:
Climatic indexes, drought, SSTAAbstract
Given the great variability of the precipitation in the Brazilian Northeast, it is necessary to use climate indexes for its monitoring. In this sense, this work aims to present a study of the space-time variation in the rainfall precipitation at the Salgado Basin, located in the state of Ceará, using the Rainfall Anomaly Index (RAI) as a tool. In order to do so, daily precipitation data from seven meteorological stations were used for the period between 1974 and 2015. From the data obtained, the RAI was calculated and plotted in spatial distribution maps. It was possible to observe that the rainy season at the basin lasts from January to April, and the driest period of the year lasts from July to October. The historical series presented drier years than rainy ones. A variation in the RAI within the basin was evidenced, and the region corresponding to Chapada do Araripe was more humid. The years with the most extreme anomalies were related to SSTA events, which favored its occurrence.Downloads
References
ANDREOLI, R.V.; KAYANO, M.T. A importância relativa do Atlântico Tropical sul e Pacífico leste na variabilidade de precipitação do nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, São Paulo. 2007; v.22, n.1, p. 63-74.
ARAÚJO, L. E.; MORAES NETO, J. M.; SOUSA, F. A. S. Classificação da precipitação anual e da quadra chuvosa da bacia do rio paraíba utilizando índice de anomalia de chuva (IAC). Revista Ambiente & Água – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science, Taubaté. 2009; v. 4, n. 3, p. 93-110.
BRABO ALVES, J. M. Recentes variações climáticas no Nordeste do Brasil com ênfase a precipitação: relações com ENOS, Dipolo de temperatura da superfície do Mar no Atlântico Tropical e a Oscilação decadal do Pacífico. Revista de Geografia. 2012; v. 29, n. 3, p. 147-166.
CEARÁ. Assembléia Legislativa. Caderno regional da bacia do salgado/Conselho de altos estudos estratégicos. Fortaleza: INESP, 2009. v. 11. 131 p.
DA SILVA, D. F. et al. Influência da variabilidade climática global e de suas escalas temporais sobre a precipitação no Alto Mundaú (PE). Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, Recife. 2012; v. 2, n. 3, p. 64-82.
FERREIRA, A. G.; MELLO, N. G. S. Principais Sistemas Atmosféricos Atuantes Sobre a Região Nordeste do Brasil e a Influência dos Oceanos Pacífico e Atlântico no Clima da Região. Revista Brasileira de Climatologia. 2005; v. 1, N. 1, dez.
FERNANDES, D. S. et al. Índices para a Quantificação da Seca. Santo Antônio de Goiás, Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 2009.
FREITAS, M. A. S. Um sistema de suporte à decisão para o monitoramento de secas meteorológicas em regiões semi-áridas. Revista Tecnologia, Fortaleza. 2005; v. suplem., p. 84-95.
KOUSKY, V. E. Frontal influences on northeast Brazil. Monthly Weather Review. 1979; v. 107, n. 9, p. 1140-1153.
KOUSKY, V. E,; GAN, M. A. Upper tropospheric cyclones vórtices in the tropical South atlantic. Tellus. 1981; v. 33, p. 538-551.
ROOY, M. P. van.A Rainfall Anomaly Index Independent of Time and Space. Notos. 1965; v.14, 43p.
SANTOS, E. C. A. dos; ARAÚJO, L. E. de.; MARCELINO, A, S. Análise climática da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Mamanguape. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 2015; v.19, n.1, p.9–14.
SANCHES, F. O.; VERDUM, R.; FISCH, G. O Índice de Anomalia de Chuva (IAC) na avaliação das precipitações anuais em Alegrete/RS (1928-2009). Caminhos de Geografia, 2014; v. 15, n. 51, p. 73-84.
SILVA, A. P. N. S et al. Correlação entre as Temperaturas da Superfície do Mar e a quantidade da precipitação na estação chuvosa no Nordeste do estado de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia. 2011; v. 26, n. 1, p. 149-156.
WALKER, GT. Ceará (Brazil) famines and the general air movement. Beitragezur Physik der freien Atmosphare, 1928; v.14, p.88-93.
XAVIER, T. M. B. S. Interrelações entre eventos ENOS (ENSO), a ZCIT (ITCZ) no Atlântico e a chuva nas bacias hidrográficas do Ceará. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos. 2003.v. 8, p. 111-126.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.