Cellular development and changes in the structure of rays in the xylem of Rollinia emarginata Schlecht. (Annonaceae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25496Abstract
Through microscopical observations in serial tangential sctions from cambium to pith the development and the most significant cellular changes in the structure of rays of Rollinia emarginata Schlecht. (Annonaceae) were observed. The ray characteristics of the outermost layer of secondary xylem are described and the major changes in the ray structure in different stages of secondary develooment are considered. The cellular changes observed are extremely variable, occurring isolated or in complex combinations. The most significant cellular changes observed during ray development are the following: origin of ray initials from fusiform initials or from cambial ray initials; changes resulting from the intrusive growth of fusiform initials through a group of ray initials and the loss of ray initials from the cambium. From these cellular transformations the most important changes in the origin of secondary rays, increase in height and width and reduction in the height of multisseriate rays are considered.
Downloads
References
Bannan, M.W. Origin and cellular character of xylem rays in gymnosperms. Bot. Gaz, 96:260-81, 1934.
Bannan, M.W. Vascular rays and adventitious root formation in Thuja occidentalis L. Am. J. Botany 28: 457-63, 1941.
Bannan, M.W. The frequency of anticlinal divisions in fusiform cambial cells of Chamaecyparis. Am. J. Botany, 37:511-19, 1950.
Barghoorn, Jr., E.S. Origin and development of theuniseriate rays in the Coniferae. Bulletin of the Torrey Club, 67:303-28, 1940a.
Barghoorn, Jr. E.S. The ontogenetic development and phylogenetic specialization of rays in the xylem of Dicotyledons. I. The primitive ray structure. Amer. J. Botany, 27:918-28, 1940b.
Barghoorn, Jr. E.S. The ontogenetic development and phylogenetic specialization of the rays in the xylem of Dicotyledons. II. Modification on the multiseriate and uniseriate rays. Amer. J. Botany, 28:273-82, 1941a.
Barghoorn, Jr. E.S. The ontogenetic development and phylogenetic specialization of rays in the xylem of Dicotyledons. III. The elimination of rays. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 68:317-25, 1941b.
Chattaway, M.M. The wood anatomy of the Family Sterculianeae. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 228:313-65, 1937.
Chadle, V. I. & Esau, K. Secondary phloem of Liriodendron tulipifera. Uni. Calif. Publ. Bot. 36:143-252. 1964.
Comission Panamericana de Normas Tecnicas. 30: 1-019, novembro, 1973.
Cumbie, B.G. Developmental changes in the vascular cambium of the Polygonum lapathifolium. Amer. J. Bot., 56: 139-46, 1969a.
Cumbie, B.G. Developmental changes in the xylem and vascular cambium of Apocynum sibiricum. Bull. Torrey Botanica Club, 96 (6): 629-40, 1969b.
Cumbie, B.G. Developmental changes in the wood of Bocconia vulcanica Donn. Smith. IAWA Bull., n.s. vol.4 (2-3):13140,1983.
Esau, K. Plant Anatomy. New York, John Wiley & Sons. 1965, 767p.
Evert, R.F. Some aspects of cambial development in Pyrus comunis, Am.,J. Bot., 48: 479-88, 1961.
Freund, H. Handbuch der Mikroskopie in der Technik. Frankfurt, Umschan Verlag. 1970, v.5, pt. 2, 379 p.
IAWA Committee on Nomenclature. Multilingual glossary of terms used in wood anatomy. Konkordia, Winterthur. 1964. 186 p.
Johansen, D.A. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1940, 523 p.
Krigs, D.A. Salient lines of structural specialization in the wood rays of Dicotyledons. Bot. Gaz., 96:547-57, 1935.
Metcalfe, C.R. & Chalk, L. Anatomy of Dicotyledons, Oxford, Claredon Press, Vol. 1,1972,724 p.
Philipson, W.R.; Ward, J.M. & Butterfield, B.G. The vascular com bium. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London, 1971, 181 p.
Wyk, R. W. van der & Canright, J. E. The anatomy and relationships of the Annonaceae. Tropical Woods, 104:1-24, 1956.
Zimmermann, M.H. & Brown, C.L. Trees: structure and function. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977, 336 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.