Phytosociological structure of a natural association of the Inhanduvá Park with quebracho and cina-cina in Rio Grande do Sul State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25419Keywords:
Phytosociology, Inhanduva Park Vegetation.Abstract
The phytosociological structure of a park's natural vegetation located in the south-west of Rio Grande do Sul State, in a Quarai Chico River neighbouring area, and under ciliary forest influence, was studied. The vegetation is characterized by the existence of Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco Schlecht. (quebracho) and Parkineonia aculeata L. (cina-cina), as well as by the presence of numerous species of ciliary forest, associated with the three typical species of the Inhanduva Park. Since this is a rare association in Brazil and because it constitutes a very fragile ecosystem, we suggest its preservation.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura. Div. de Pesquisas Pedológicas. Levantamento de Reconhecimento dos Solos do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Recife, 1973. 431 p. (Bolo Tecn. Nº 30).
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal. Inventário Florestal Nacional - Florestas nativas, Rio Grande do Sul. Brasília, 1983. 345 p.
BRAUN BLANQUET, J. Fitosociologia - Bases para el. estudio de las comunidades vegetales. 3. ed. Madrid, H. Blume Ediciones, 1979, 820 p.
BRÜNIG, E.F. & HEUVELDDP, J. Structure and functions in natural and man-made forests in the humid tropics. In: IUFRO WORLD CONGRESS, 16, Norway, 1976. p.500-511.
BURKART, A. Las Leguminosas argentinas silvestres y cultivadas. Buenos Aires, ACME Agency, 1952. 569 p.
CAINE, S.A. & CASTRO, G.M. de O. Application of some phytosocilogical techniques to Brazilian Rain Forest. Amer.J.Bot., 43 (3):205-217,1956.
DIHITRI, M.J. Libro del àrbol - Esencias forestales indigenas de la Argentina de aplicación ornamental. Buenos Aires, Celulosa Argentina S. A., 1973. s-p (Tomo I).
FINOL, U.H. Posibilidades de Manejo Silvicultural para las reservas forestales de la region occidental. Rev.For.Venez.,12 (17):81-107, 1969.
_________. Nuevos parâmetros a considerarse en el análisis estructural de las selvas virgenes tropicales. Rev. For. Venez., 14(21):29-42,1971.
FONT-QUER, P. Dicionário de Botânica. 5. ed. Barcelona, Labor, 1975. 1244 p.
FÖRSTER, M. Strukturanalyses eines tropischen Regenwaldes in Kolumbien. Allg. Forst. -u- J. -Ztg., 144(1):1-8,1973.
GOLDSTEIN, R.A. & GRIGAL, D.F. Definition of vegetation structre by canonical analysis. J. Ecol., 62 (2):277-284, 1972.
KELLMAN, M.C. Plant Ecology. London, Methuem, 1975. 135 p.
KOSTLER, J.N. Zur Frage der strukturanalyse von Bestaenden. In: IUFRO KONGRESS, 12., Oxford, 1958. p. 28-34.
LAMPRECHT, H. Ueber ProfilaufnaBen em Tropenwald. In: IUFRO KONGRESS, 12., Oxford, 1958. p. 34.43.
LAMPRECHT, H. Ensayo sobre unos metodos para el análisis estructural de los bosques tropicales. Acta Cientifica Venezolana, 13(2):57-65.1962.
____________. Ensayo sobre la estructura floristica de la parte sur-oriental del bosque Universitario "El Caimital" – Estado Barinas. Rev.For.Venez., 7(10-11):77-119,1964.
LOMBARDO, A. Flora arborea y arborescente del Uruguay.Montevideo, Concejo Departamental, s/d. 151 p.
LONGHI, S.J. A estrutura de uma floresta natural de Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O Ktze., no sul do Brasil. Curitiba, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 1980. 198 p. Tese de Mestrado.
MARCHIORI, J.NC.; LONGHI, S.J. & GALVÃO, L. O gênero Prosopis L. (Leguminosae Mimosoideae) no Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência e Natura, 5:171-177, 1983.
MORENO, J.A. Clima do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Secretaria da Agricultura - Dir. Terras e Colon., 1961. 42 p.
OOSTING, H.J. The study of plant: communities. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Company, 1966. 440 p.
RAMBO, B. A fisionomia do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Livraria Selbach, 1956. 456 p.
RAMBO, B. Legumínosae Riograndenses. Pesquisas, série Botânica. São Leopoldo, Instituto Anchietano de Pesquisas. Bol. N º 23, 1966. 166 p.
REITZ, R.; KLElN, R.M. & REIS, A. Projeto Madeira do Rio Grande do Sul. Sellowia, (34-35):1-525,1983.
SOUZA, P.F. de. Terminologia florestal: glossário de termo e expressões florestais. Rio de Janeiro, Fundação IBGE, 1973. 304 p.
TORTORELLI, L.A. Maderas y bosques argentinos. Buenos Aires,ACME,1956. 910 p.
VELOSO, H.P. & GOES FILHO, L. Fitogeografia brasileira: Classificação Fisionômica-Ecológica da Vegetação Neotropical. In: BRASIL. Ministério das Minas e Energia. Projeto RADAMBRASIL. Salvador, 1982. 85 p. (Boletim Técnico Série Vegetação, 1 ).
VOLKART, C.M. Determinacion de la relacion diametro/copa: diametro tronco en Araucaria angustifolia y pynus elliottii en la Provincia de Misiones. In: CONGRESSO FORESTAL ARGENTINO, 1., Buenos Aires, 1969. Actas ... p. 231-237.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
