Morphology of glandular hairs and phitochemical aspects of monoic Cannabis sativa L.

Authors

  • Jussara Bernardes da Silva Departamento de Análises Químicas e Toxicológicas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde - CCS, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.
  • Maria Antonieta Baldissera Departamento de Análises Químicas e Toxicológicas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde - CCS, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.
  • Amélia Moema Veiga Lopes Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X24977

Abstract

A description of the resin producing glandular hairs of the monoecius Cannabis Sativa L. was made by the authors, as well as a phytochemical study of it, including TLC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CALABRESE, A. I. & ASTOLFI, E. A., Marihuana. In: Toxicologia. Buenos Aires. Kapelusz, 1969. p. 267-8.

CALDAS, A., Chemical Identification of Cannabis. Anal. Chim. Acta, Netherlands, 49: 194, 1969.

CARAUTA, J.P.P., Canabáceas. Flora Ilustrada Catarinense , Santa Catarina, P. Raulino Reitz, 1975. 17p.

COSTA, O.A. & JACCOUD, R.J.S., Algumas considerações farmacognósticas referentes ao Cannabis sativa L.. Rev. Bras. Farm., Brasil, 48(1): 3-25, 1967.

FONT'QUER, P., Cannabáceas In: Plantas Medicinales El dioscorides Renovado. Barcelona, 2a. ed., 1973. p. 127-9.

HAMMOND, C.T. & MAHLBERG, P.G., Morphology of glandular hairs of Cannabis sativa from scanning electron microscopy. Amer. J. Bot. 60 (1): 524-8, 1973.

HAYWARD, Herman E., The structure of economic plants. New York, Macmillan Company, 1948.

KARNIOL, I.G. & CARLlNI, E.A., Comparative studies in man and in laboratory animals on Delta 8 - and Delta 9 – transtetrahydro cannabinol. Pharmacology. 9: 115-26. 1973.

KOHN, ABREST E. Précis de Toxicologie. 3a. ed., Paris, G. Doin, 1955.

LOPES, V.J.X. & LOPES A.M.V., Características morfológicas externas de uma planta monóica de Cannabis sativa L .. Ciência e Natura, Santa Maria, 1: 113-9, 1979.

MURAD, J.E. O que você deve saber sobre os psicotrópicos. A viagem sem bilhete de volta. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gráfica, 1972. 157p.

PRADO, A. B., Contribuição para o conhecimento da maconha brasileira. An. Farm. Quim., 10 (11 e 12):1-16,1959.

PEREIRA, J.R., Contribuição para o estudo das Plantas Alucinatórias, particularmente da Maconha (Cannabis sativa). Rev. Fl. Med., 12 ( 3 ): 1, 1 945.

SASS, J.E., Botanical microtechnique. 2a. ed., Iowa, The Iowa State College, 1951. 228 p.

SCHMIDT, I., A ilusão das drogas. 2a. ed., São Paulo, Publicadora Brasileira, 1976. 144 p.

SILVA, J.B. & ALVES, A., Análises Toxicológica, Santa Maria, Imprensa Universitária. 1979. 74p.

SMALL, E & CRONQUIST, A., A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis. Taxon. 25 (4): 405-35, 1976.

Downloads

Published

1982-12-13

How to Cite

Silva, J. B. da, Baldissera, M. A., & Lopes, A. M. V. (1982). Morphology of glandular hairs and phitochemical aspects of monoic Cannabis sativa L. Ciência E Natura, 4(4), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X24977

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 4, N. 4, 1982

Section

Articles

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.