The reduction of forest areas in a wheat region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X24849Abstract
In this study, it was realized the photointerpretation of arboreous and shrubby vegetal formations in some parts of areas of the municipalities of Cruz Alta, Pejuçara, Ijuí, Tupanciretã, Augusto Pestana and Júlio de Castilhos, contained between the 53 ° 30 'and 54 ° 00 ' West Longitude coordinates and the South Latitude 28 ° 30' and 28 ° 57 ' concerning the years 1964 and 1974, with objective of checking the intensity of deflorestation in that region.
From the information obtained from from vertical aerophotography interpretation, and orbital images calculations were made to determine the intensity of arboreous and shrubby reduction occured in a period of ten years.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura. Divisão de Pedologia. Levantamento Reconhecimento dos solos do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Recife, Divisão de Pesquisas Pedológicas, 1973. 431 p. (Boletim Técnico 30).
CARNEIRO, C.M.R. & SILVA, A.B. Utilização Comparativa de Imagens do Landsat I e Fotografias Aéreas Verticais em Mapeamento de Vegetação. Santa Maria, U.F.S.M. 1976, 15 p.
CERON, A.O. & DINIZ, J.A.F. Tipologia da Agricultura - Questões Metodológicas e Problemas de Aplicação no Estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Geografia, ano 32., nº 3 jul/set. 1971.Fundação•I.B.G.E., Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia.
FERREIRA, L.A.B. et al. Quebra Ventos Arbóreos. Porto Alegre. Boletim Técnico da FECOTRIGO, ano II. Nº 17, out/76. 15 p.
GARCIA, I.S. Utilização das Imagens MSS Landsat I(Erts) no Mapeamento do Uso Atual da Terra. Porto Alegre, Boletim Geográfico do Rio Grande do Sul, ano 20, nº 18, jan/dez. 1975. 80 p.
GUERRA, A.T. Recursos Naturais do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia. Publicação nº 25. 1969. 183 p.
LA SALVIA, F. Identificação das Formas de Uso da Terra e Cobertura Vegetal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Boletim Geográfico do Rio Grande do Sul, ano 18, nº 16. jan/dez. 1973.125p.
LINDMAN, C.A.M. & FERRI, M.G. A Vegetação do Rio Grande do Sul, ed. Itatiaia, 1974. 377 p.
MENEGOTTO, E.; SARTORI, P.L.P.; MACIEL FILHO, C.L. Nova Sequência Sedimentar Sobre a Serra Geral no Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Maria, U.F.S.M. 1968. 20 p.
RAMBO, B. A Fisionomia do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Ed. Selbach.J.S., 1956. 6.v. 456 p.
ROCHA, J.S.M. & CARNEIRO, C.M.R. Mosaicos Aero-fotogramétricos. Santa Maria, Imprensa Universitária. U.F.S.M. 1975. 30 p.
Satélite Controla Desmatamento na Região Amazônica. Correio do Povo. Porto Alegre, 13 mar. 1977.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
