Evaluating Girls Students Dormitories With an Emphasis on Comfort and Intimacy view
Keywords:Girls. Comfort. Intimacy. Students dormitory. Safety.
Many researches, performance in the field of social behavior, have evaluated the issue of intimacy along with culture, religion and environment, intimacy is very important in girls dormitory; the issue of intimacy, as a principle dominating all aspects of life, has beautifully been introduced and discussed in Iranian architecture. The factor of being Iranian integrated with Islamic culture, art and thought, as given a new feature to Iranian art. The present research aims to study student dormitories with the emphasis on comfort & intimacy. The research method is descriptive – analytic based on surveys; and the technique is using questionnaire. The statistical population is the students living in the city of Tafresh with 300 samples selected purposefully. According to the results, the variables of comfort and intimacy not only can be useful for the security of girls hostel, it also can affect the relationships of the students with outside the dormitory and their comfort inside the dormitory. Regarding the component of intimacy in designing dormitory, it possible to create maximum spaces inaccessible to others; building unroofed, cozy and open spaces helps students to reside in this place for longer time, and to feel safety in this environment as their own home. Comfort and intimacy are of mutual relations; the more you consider the principles of intimacy, the more the girls of hostel feel comfortable.
Everett, D, 87, loftus (zoll). “Resideut Assistauts as Rule
Hakim, B, S, (1969) Arabic Islamic cites: Bulding and planing priuciples (p.256). Routledge.
Newell, D.B.(1995). Perspectives on privacy. Journal of Enironmental Psychology. 15, 87-104.
Rousel, T, 8 R Elleven (2009). Im proving Resideut
Altman, Irwin, & Chemers, M. (1984). Culture and Environment (First., p. 337). Cambridge University Press.
Tabrizi, Mostafa. 2000. Psychoanalysis of Living in Student's Dormitories. Monthly Payam-e-Zan. No 7
Hafeznia, Mohamad Reza. 2011. An Introduction to Research Methodology in the Humanities. Tehran: Samt Dey, The institute of the Study and Development of Human Science Academic Books.
Doctor Tousi, 1994. Student's Dormitories as Student's State, Jame-e-Salem Magazine. No 15
Rajabi, Abbas. Hijab and its Role in Mental Health, 2007. Center of Imam Khomeini Institute of Education and Research
Aliabadi, Mohammad et al. 2000. Studying Environment Psychological Indexes in Designing Student's Dormitories. Journal of Psychological Methods and Models. No 2.
Karimpur Fard, Mehrdad, 2007. Designing Student's Dormitories in Tehran District 22, Master Thesis/ Tehran University.
Mohamadi Farahran, Elham et al. 2012. Evaluating the Relationship between Quality of Sleep and Mental Health of Students Living in Dormitory. Quarterly of Danesh & Tandorosti (Science and Health), Seventh Issue, No 3.
Jihad Deneshgi Research Deputy, Tehran Branch/2005. Designing Girl's Schools with Regard to Intimacy and Comfort.
Mahdavi nejad, Mohamad Javad, Mohammad Mashayekhi, 2010. The Needs for Designing Mosque Based on Socio-cultural Functions, Two Science-Research Journals of Armanshahr (Utopia), No 5.
Mirheydar, Mohsen, 1994. Student's Dormitories Design and Research Affairs, First Seminar on Student's Dormitories issues.
Mirheydar, Mohsen, 2001. Comparing Social and Cultural Conditions of the Family with Compatibility of the Students Residing in Alzahra University Dormitory.
Mirzaee, Soudabe, 2010 - 2011. Girl Student's Dormitory. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Tafresh Branch.
Milanifar, Behrouz, 1995. Mental Health. Tehran: Ghos Publication.
How to Cite
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.