Effect of nanoparticles on heat transfer in heat exchangers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20848Abstract
In this paper, forced convection flow and heat transfer of a Al2O3/Water nanofluid have beeninvestigated numerically by single and two phase (volume of fluid) models. Nanofluid flows inside the innertube of the isothermally concentric circular and sinusoidal double tube heat exchangers while hot pure waterflows in the outer tube. The single-phase and two-phase models is used to simulate the nanofluid forcedconvection of 2% and 3% volume concentrations. The renormalization group k-ε model is used to simulateturbulence in ANSYS FLUENT 15.0. Results show that the overall heat transfer coefficient increases withnanoparticle volume concentrations in the heat exchangers. The highest overall heat transfer coefficient rates aredetected, for each concentration and shape, corresponding to the highest flow rate for the sinusoidal tube heatexchanger . The maximum overall heat transfer coefficient enhancement is 220% for the particle volumeconcentration of 3% at the inner tube of concentric sinusoidal double tube heat exchanger corresponding to flowrate =10 LPM. The results reveal that the Al2O3/water pressure drop along the inner tube of circular andsinusoidal double tube heat exchanger increases by about 3% and 5% for volume concentrations of 2% and 3%,respectively, given flow rate compared to the base fluid.Comparison of these results with Rohit S. Khedkar‘spublished experimental data, showed good agreement.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
