Improving OSPF Protocol based Latency : A new algorithm based on Dijkstra by using OSPF existing Metrics in SDN networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20793Abstract
SDN (software defined networking)-based networks may be defined as a new generation of networks using virtual layers and switches and central controller which try to handle a few controlling and managerial tasks of switches and rotors of networks in upper layers on a software basis. In fact, it reduced dependence to hardware and increases software capabilities. These networks face challenges such as quality of relationship between controller and devices existing in the network and delay in network that is subject of this thesis. According to the applied researches, one of offered solutions for reduction of delay is using path finding algorithms. Rotors’ task is transfer of information. Algorithms must be implemented on these rotors to choose the best path for data transfer in the network. Path finding table is used in rotor. According to the data available in path finding table, the best path is found. Each path finder must have complete information of network’s communication infrastructure and calculate and identify all other paths of communications between them and their costs. Later, data collection forms the data structure related to network infrastructure graph. In these conditions, to find the best path between path finders, the shortest path algorithms (SPT) are used such as Dijkstra. Since rotors receive the sent update massages due to network changes, path finding table amends itself and identifies the new probability path. Selection of best path is made by massages metric. Upon processor fastening and hardware cheapening, a standard protocol in the name of OSPF was presented that manufactured by CISCO, particularly in a network that its equipment are not necessarily made by CISCO is based on Dijkstra and uses cost and band broadness as metric, transfer the data related to connected network and rotors connected to network between adjacent rotors and records all of its information in the table. Later, Dijkstra's algorithm is implemented and the best paths led to different destinations are inserted in the path finding table. The objective of this study was presenting an algorithm based on Dijkstra there in addition to cost Metric, another metric to be used that highly reduces traffic in the network and improves delay time in the network.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.