Improved Energy Conversion Process With Coupling Induction Motors And Invastigate Unbalanced Operation With Definition Of The Voltage Unbalance

Authors

  • Hossin Rezaei Koopaei DQ-CCNE/UFSM
  • Rahim Eildarabadi
  • Mahmoud Zade Bagheri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20787

Abstract

This paper assesses Voltage unbalance study as one of power quality issues which is especially effected distribution voltages and is noteworthy. however it is possible that voltage in level of producing and transmission be balanced but this voltages in level of distribution can go out of balance and be unbalanced which is because of unbalanced systems, unequal impedances and lack of appropriate and balanced distribution of one phase loads in distribution systems occurs. In this thesis operation of steady state machine conjunction (Induction motor) under unbalanced voltage will be evaluated. Induction motors in small sizes attach as coupled and will be used instead of big sized induction motors, which is proper for improved electromagnetic systems and more efficient energy conversion mechanism in both symmetric and asymmetric states. Two coupled induction motors can have the same or different rates mechanically. This thesis will analyze coupled machinery using symmetric elements and MATLAB software. Definition of unbalance voltage is used by CVUF factor (complex voltage unbalance factor). Induction motors coupling with DC motors (direct current) is analyzed and coupling effect in electromagnetic torque in all system is studied and comparing of unbalanced voltage on standalone and coupled machines is demonstrateed. The purpose of such comparing is finding the best states in balanced and unbalanced working, also this thesis evaluates the effect of induction motors connection as coupling in energy conversion process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-19

How to Cite

Koopaei, H. R., Eildarabadi, R., & Bagheri, M. Z. (2015). Improved Energy Conversion Process With Coupling Induction Motors And Invastigate Unbalanced Operation With Definition Of The Voltage Unbalance. Ciência E Natura, 37, 307–311. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20787

Issue

Vol. 37 (2015): SPECIAL EDITION - PART 2

Section

Special Edition

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.