Evaluating the relationship between the requirements of teleworking government establishments with the success of teleworking program in Fars province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20749Abstract
Methodology / Approach: To identify the relationship between parameters of teleworking and its success rate in the governmental agencies of Fars province. Population and Statistical Sample: All the inspectors in the Bureau of Labor and Social Affairs, that include 21 members from the operator information “118”, 50 members from the Fars province Telecommunications ministry, with and a total population of teleworkers of n=71 were studied in this research, of which 20 inspectors from the of Fars province and 30 operators information office enquiries “118”, therefore a total n=50 completed the Teleworking questionnaires. Purpose of this study: To evaluate the relationship between the dependent variable (success teleworking) and 5 independent variables (1.rules and regulations 2. the support of Top management 3. perceived benefits of teleworking 4. Trust 5. Culture). Analysis: Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out, including Pearson correlation, linear regression and multistage regression. Conclusion: The results of this study clearly show that compliance with the Constraints and limitations had a direct and significant impact on the success of teleworking. An interesting point, in this study, is that the simultaneous linear regression model results indicate a significant relationship at relatively high level (69%) between requirements of each of the variables with the success of telework. The results of multiple regression indicate that with regards to the simultaneous effects of the variables consisting of 1.Top management supported 2. Trust 3, Rules and Regulations, 4.Culture, there was a significant correlation with successful teleworking. However, the perceived benefits variable was not significant in the model, and as such the simultaneous effect the cycle was removed. In the information age, with the fast development of systems technologies and telecommunications, a telework program is not just a likely option but a clever and strategic business decision.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
