LEARNING ABOUT SOLUTIONS BY EXPERIMENTAL ACTIVITIES IN THE CONCEPTUAL MAPS CONSTRUCTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X18143Keywords:
Atividades experimentais, Mapas conceituais, aprendizagem significativa.Abstract
The searching for better results in the teaching and learning process in the chemistry subject justifies the teacher's necessity to use different pedagogical strategies. This job is about an experience with students from the Computer Science Technical High School second grade, from the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Farroupilha - Campus Alegrete, using the chemistry lab as a space of investigation. The experiments were accomplished to talk about solubility and solution concentration. The applied conceptual maps in the pre and post-activity had as a purpose to verify the students’ knowledge about the studied subject, comparing them during the activities. The methodology allowed to notice the formal teaching interference when the purpose is to mediate the discoveries, when the experimentation can turn the learning more meaningful. From the applied methodologies, it was possible to find a potential growth in the concepts related to the solutions, verifying that the methodology propitiated a meaningful learning.
Downloads
References
Ausubel, D. P.(1982). A aprendizagem significativa: a teoria de David Ausubel. São Paulo: Moraes, 1982.
Ausubel, D. P. (2003). Aquisição e Retenção de Conhecimentos: Uma Perspectiva Cognitiva. Lisboa: Plátano.
Barão, G. C. (2006). Ensino de Química em Ambientes Virtuais. Universidade Federal do Paraná.
Betemps, et al. (2010). A Utilização de Mapas Conceituais na Compreensão de Novas Tecnologias na Educação. URL: www.ccae.ufpb.br/sbie2010/anais/WAIADTE_files/78096_1.pdf.
Borges, A. T. (2002). Novos Rumos para o Laboratório Escolar de Ciências. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 19(3), 291-313.
Brasil, Ministério da Educação, Secretaria de Educação Básica (2008). Orientações Curriculares para o Ensino Médio, v.2, pp.135.
Cardoso, P. S., Colinvaux, D. (2000). Explorando a motivação para estudar química. URL: http://quimicanova.sbq.org.br/qn/qnol/2000/vol23n3/v23_n3_(17).pdf.
Chassot, A. (2003). Alfabetização científica: uma possibilidade para a inclusão social. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Programa de Pós Graduação em Educação.
Cunha,M.J.S., Fernandes, C. T., Omar, N., Silva, V. (2004). Avaliação de Aprendizagem Significativa Usando Mapas Conceituais num Ambiente Cooperativo. XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação – SBIE.
Dutra, I. M.; Piccinini, C.A.; Becker, J.L.; Johann, S. P.; Fagundes, L. C. (2006). Blog, wiki e mapas conceituais digitais no desenvolvimento de Projetos de Aprendizagem com alunos do Ensino Fundamental. Novas Tecnologias na Educação, 4(2).
Feltre, R. (2004). Química – Físico Química. 6 ed. Moderna.
Ferreira, L. H., Hartwig, D. R., Oliveira, R. C. (2010) Ensino Experimental de Química: Uma Abordagem Investigativa Contextualizada. Química Nova na Escola,32(2), 101-106.
Fonseca, M. R. M. (2003). Interatividade Química: Cidadania, participação e transformação. FTD.
Freitas, J. R. F. (2007). Mapas conceituais: estratégia pedagógica para construção de conceitos na disciplina química orgânica. Ciências & Cognição, 12, 86-95.
Guimarães, C. C. (2009). Experimentação no Ensino de Química: Caminhos e Descaminhos Rumo à Aprendizagem Significativa. Química Nova na Escola, 31(3).
Moreira, M. A. (1999). A Teoria de Ausubel. In: Aprendizagem Significativa. Editora UnB, 1999.
Moreira, M. A. (2004). Pesquisa básica em educação em Ciências: uma visão pessoal. Revista Chilena de Educación Cientifica, 3(1).
Moreira, M. A. (2005). Aprendizagem significativa crítica. Porto Alegre.
Novak, J. (1997). Retorno a clarificar com mapas conceptuales. Em: Encuentro Internacional sobre el aprendizaje significativo. Burgos: Servivio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Burgos.
Novak, J. D.; Canãs, A. J. (2010). A Teoria Subjacente aos Mapas Conceituais e como Elaborá-los e Usá-los. Práxis Educativa, 5(1), 9-29.URL: http://www.periodicos.uepg.br.
Silva, R.R.; Machado, P. F. L.; Tunes, E. (2010) Experimentar sem medo de errar. In: SANTOS, W. L. P.; MALDANER, O. A. Ensino de Química em Foco. Unijuí, pp. 231-261.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
