FLORISTIC CHARACTERIZATION OF RIPARIAN FOREST OF JACAQUÁ STREAM – ALEGRETE, RS, BRASIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X17931Keywords:
Mata Ciliar. Arroio Jacaquá. Florística.Abstract
This paper presents a characterization of the riparian forest of Jacaquá stream, Alegrete. The Jacaquá stream, located in the eastern part of the city of Alegrete, in the 2nd District of step New, is a tributary on the left bank of Ibicuí river, and the vegetation of the watershed under study stands out for two distinct formations: the country and forest. For the elaboration of geographic location map, the TrackMaker Professional GPS Software and Corel Draw X6 were used, the cartographic base vector of the RS and satellite images. The floristic survey of qualitative nature was developed, based on the traversal methodology, ended the samples from the stabilization of the "collector curve" the collection and follow-up time was extended for one year. The floristic samples collected revealed that this forest is mainly characterized by species such as Lithraea molleoides (Vell.) Engl., Syagrus romanzoffiana (Cham.) Glassman., Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez, Symplocos uniflora (Pohl) Benth., Eugenia uniflora L., among others. This work results in a significant subsidy for activities related to environmental management and education in the municipality and region, because in general the population is unaware of the existing native plant species, even if they constitute one of the main elements of the biota to be considered.
Downloads
References
ALVES, F. da S. Estudos Fitogeográficos na Bacia Hidrográfica do Arroio Lajeado Grande – Oeste do RS, Santa Maria – RS. 2008. 106f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia) – Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2008.
ALVES, F. da S; MARCHIORI, J. N. C; GUADGNIN, P. M. A; DORNELES, R. G. Vegetação original. In: Série Atlas Municipais: Atlas Geoambiental de Manoel Viana/RS, 2014.
DORNELES, R. G; FLÔRES, A. de D; ALVES, F. da S. Aspectos fisionômico-florísticos da vegetação natural na fazenda Santa Rita, Alegrete-RS. In Anais. Congrega URCAMP, 2014.
DURIGAN, G. Métodos para análise de vegetação arbórea. In: LARRY, C. VALLADARES-PADUA, C. & RUDRAN, R. (Org.). Métodos de Estudos em Biologia da Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre. 2ª Ed. Curitiba: Ed. Da UFPR: Fundação O Boticário de Proteção a Natureza. 2006.
FILGUEIRAS, T. S.; BROCHADO, A. L.; NOGUEIRA, P.E.; GUALA II, G. F. Caminhamento: um método expedito para levantamentos florísticos qualitativos. Cadernos de Geociências, v.2, n.4, p.39–43, 1994.
HASENACK, H; WEBER, E. (Org.). Base Cartográfica Vetorial Contínua do Rio Grande do Sul – Escala 1:50.000. Porto Alegre, RS: UFRGS - Centro de Ecologia - Laboratório de Geoprocessamento, 2010.
LINDMAN, C. A. M. A vegetação no Rio Grande do Sul. Belo Horizonte: Ed. Itatiaia, 1974, 377p.
MARCHIORI, J.N.C. Fitogeografia do Rio Grande do Sul: campos sulinos. Porto Alegre: EST, 2004.
RAMBO, B. A Fisionomia do Rio Grande do Sul: ensaio de monografia natural (1956). 3 ed. São Leopoldo: Ed. Da UNISINOS, 2000.
RICARDO, V. P. Projeto de Recuperação das Matas Ciliares. 2008, 51f. Ibitinga/SP.
SECRETARIA ESTADUAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE – RS. Diretrizes ambientais para restauração de matas ciliares. Porto Alegre: SEMA, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
