“Aesthetical pleasure” in the reflection on happiness by Schopenhauer

Authors

  • Anerson Gonçalves de Lemos Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378638690

Keywords:

Ethics, Metaphysics, Aesthetics, Earthly happiness, Pure happiness

Abstract

In this paper, we present a reflection on happiness as seen by Schopenhauer, addressing the notion of “aesthetical pleasure” or “pure happiness”, two interchangeable concepts he presented in his metaphysics of the beautiful. Initially, we will generally approach the topic of happiness in accordance with Schopenhauerian metaphysics. Then, we will perform an analysis of the notion of “earthly happiness”, identified with satisfaction of desires, which is radically different from the concept of aesthetical pleasure. In this sense, the aim of this second section is to provide elements to be later used in the explanation of the main topic of this paper. Finally, we will examine the notion of pure happiness as a way of singular satisfaction. We will examine the status of this kind of happiness from an analysis of Schopenhauer’s psychology and mainly his aesthetics, in which it is presented and developed, and then we will analyze it as a positive and hedonistic state of satisfaction.

Downloads

Author Biography

Anerson Gonçalves de Lemos, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Doutorando em Filosofia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria.

References

BARBOZA, Jair. Infinitude subjetiva e estética: natureza e arte em Schelling e Schopenhauer. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp, 2005.

BARBOZA, Jair. “Parentesco entre Estética e Ética”. In Temas de Ética. Organização de Inês Lacerda de Araújo e Francisco Verardi Bocca. Curitiba: Ed. Champagnat, 2005.

BIRNBACHER, Dieter. Arthur Schopenhauer: vontade e negação do mundo. In: FLEISCHER, Margot; HENNIGFELD, Jochem (org). Filósofos do século XIX: uma introdução. Tradução de Dankwart Bernsmüller. São Leopoldo: Editora UNISINOS, 2007.

CALLEJÓN, Encarnación Ruiz. La extensión de la comunidade moral em Schopenhauer: la moral de lacompasión y elsufrimiento de losanimales. Convivium, v. 20, 2007, pp. 145-172.

CARTWRIGHT, E. David. Historical Dictionary of Schopenhauer´s Philosophy. Oxford: Scarecrow Press, 2005.

KOßLER Matthias. Life is but a Mirror: On the Connection between Ethics, Metaphysics and Character in Schopenhauer. IN. Better Consciousness: Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Value. Edited by Alex Neill and Christopher Janaway. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

MISRAHI, Robert. A felicidade: ensaio sobre a alegria. Trad. de Flávia Nascimento. Rio de Janeiro: DIFEL, 2001.

SALLOUM, Jamil Jr. A ética ascética de Arthur Schopenhauer e o hinduísmo: um estudo bibliográfico-comparativo: assonâncias e dissonâncias. 2007. 119 f. (Dissertação de Mestrado em Filosofia), Universidade Católica do Paraná. Curitiba, 2007.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. O mundo como vontade e como representação. Tomo I. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: Ed. UNESP, 2005.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. O mundo como vontade e representação. Tomo II. 2 vols. Trad. Eduardo Ribeiro da Fonseca. Curitiba: Ed. UFPR, 2014.

SCHOPENHAUER, A Metafísica do Belo. Tradução, apresentação e notas de Jair Barboza. São Paulo: UNESP, 2003.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Parerga y Paralipómena. Madri: Valdemar letras clásicas, 2009.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Sämtliche Werke. Textkritisch bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Wolfgang von Löhneysen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986.

TANNER, Michael. Schopenhauer: metafísica e arte. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: UNESP, 2001.

Published

2019-09-04

How to Cite

Lemos, A. G. de. (2019). “Aesthetical pleasure” in the reflection on happiness by Schopenhauer. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 10(2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378638690