Moralidad y felicidad en Schopenhauer y en Kant: conciertos y desacuerdos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378634087Keywords:
Morality, happiness, eudemonism.Abstract
In this paper we will try to explore the problematic relation between morality and happiness in both Kant and Schopenhauer’s view. To this respect, we will focus on the schopenhauerian reception of some Kantian accounts concerning morality and happiness, aiming to show the reasons why Schopenhauer either accept or reject them. In order to analyze this issue, we will center our attention in two apparently contradictory claims made by Schopenhauer: on the one hand, that one of the biggest merit of Kant´s ethics is to have rejected eudemonism; on the other, that this rejection has been more apparent than real.Downloads
References
ANSCOMBE, G.E.M. “Modern Moral Philosophy”. En: Philosophy, Vol. 33, 1958, pp. 1-19.
EPICURO. Obras. Trad. M. Jufresa. Barcelona: Altaya, 1997.
GUARIGLIA, Osvaldo. “Eudemonismo y Virtud en la Ética Antigua: Aristóteles y los Estoicos”. En: Revista Diálogos 80, 2002, pp. 1-47.
ENGSTROM, S. “Happiness and the Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant”. En Engstrom, S. (et al.) (eds.), Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 102-138.
HERMAN, Barbara. “Rethinking Kant´s hedonism”. En: Facts and Value. Essays on ethics and metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2001.
IRWIN, Terence. “Prudence and Morality in Greek Ethics”. En: Ethics, Vol. 105, N° 2, 1995, pp. 284-295.
IRWIN, Terence. “Kant´s Criticisms of Eudaemonism”. En: Engstrom, S. (et al.) (eds.) Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 63-101.
KANT, Inmanuel. Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Trad. M. García Morente. Madrid: Tecnos, 2005.
KANT, Inmanuel. Crítica de la Razón Práctica. Trad. J. Rovira Armengol. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2007.
KANT, Inmanuel. Antropología en sentido pragmático. Trad. M. Caimi. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2009.
KANT, Inmanuel. Crítica de la Razón Pura. Trad. Pedro Ribas. Madrid: Gredos, 2010.
RAWLS, John. Lecciones sobre la historia de la filosofía moral. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. El Fundamento de la Moral. Trad. Vicente Romano García. Buenos Aires: Aguilar, 1960.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Escritos Inéditos de Juventud 1808-1818. Sentencias y Aforismos II. Trad. y Selec. Roberto Aramayo. Valencia: Pre-textos, 1999.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. El Mundo como Voluntad y Representación. Vol. 1. Trad. Roberto Aramayo. Madrid: FCE, 2005.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. El Mundo como Voluntad y Representación. Vol. II. Trad. Roberto Aramayo. Madrid: FCE, 2005.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Parerga y Paralipomena I. Trad. P. Lopez de Santamaría. Madrid: Trotta, 2006.
VLASTOS, Gregory. “Happiness and Virtue in Socrates´ Moral Theory”. En: Socrates. Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
WILLIAMS, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.
WOOD, Allen. “Kant versus Eudaimonism”. En: Kant´s Legacy: Essays in honor of Lewis White Beck. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2001, pp. 261-281.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The submission of original manuscripts to this journal implies the transference, by the authors, of the copyrights for printed and digital publication. The copyrights of a published manuscript belong ultimately to the author, and only the copyright for its first publication is reserved to the journal. Authors may only use the same results in other publications explicitly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication.
Licence
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) - This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
