The Theory of Justice in John Rawls and Robert Nozick’s debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236672548546Keywords:
Robert Nozick, Theory of Justice, Entitlement Theory, John Rawls, LiberalismAbstract
The increase in the scope of liberal or even libertarian ideas has motivated returns to important works of thought in this field. In this sense, it is justified in an attempt to retake some of the most important theoretical constructions in this field, especially that produced by Robert Nozick, notably in his book Estado, Anarquia e Utopia. For this, however, a brief presentation of John Rawls' work, A theory of Justice, is also necessary, understanding that this work is a fundamental part to understand Nozick's own construction. Thus, a strictly theoretical work is proposed that seeks to reflect on the importance of the debate on the theory of justice based on the contributions of these authors. At the end, the main divergences between the two authors are evidenced and other aspects that cross the debate on the theory of justice in the present time are also highlighted, with emphasis on the theory of recognition, especially in the form in which it was proposed by Axel Honneth.
Downloads
References
DUSSEL, E. 1492: el encubrimiento del otro: hacia el origen del "mito de la modernidad": conferencias de Frankfurt, octubre de 1992.
FRASER, N. Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review, London, n. 3, p. 107-120, May-June. 2000.
FRASER, N. “From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘postsocialist’ age”. In: S. Seidman; J.A. (orgs.). 2001. The new social theory reader. Londres: Routledge, pp. 285-293. 2001a.
FRASER, N. Recognition without Ethics? Theory, Culture & Society, London, v. 18, n. 2-3, p. 21-42, June. 2001b.
FREEMAN, S. Illiberal libertarians: Why libertarianism is not a liberal view. Philosophy & Public Affairs, v. 30, n. 2, p. 105-151, 2001.
HABERMAS, J. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992.
HONNETH, A. A textura da justiça – sobre os limites do procedimentalismo contemporâneo. In: Civitas – Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 9, n. 3. Porto Alegre: PUC-RS, set.–dez. 2009, p.345-368. Disponível em: http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/article/view/6896/5023. Acesso em 01/07/2020.
HONNETH, A; ANDERSON, J. Autonomia, vulnerabilidade, Reconhecimento e Justiça. In: Cardenos de Filosofia Alemã, v.17, p.81-113, 2011.
NOZICK, R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
NOZICK, R. Anarquia, estado e utopia. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2011, 395p.
RAWLS, J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Pres of Harvard University Press, 1971. xv, 607p.
RAWLS, J. Liberalismo político. UNAM, 1995.
SEN, A. A ideia de justiça. Editora Companhia das Letras, 2011.
SIMIM, T. A. Entre comunitaristas e liberais: a teoria da justiça de Axel Honneth. Rev. Direito Práx., Rio de Janeiro, v. 8, n. 1, p. 386-412, Mar. 2017.
TAYLOR, C. The politics of recognition. In: TAYLOR, C. Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994, pp.25-73.
VITA, A. Liberalismo, justiça social e responsabilidade individual. DADOS - Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 54, n. 4, p. 569-608, 2011.
VITA, A. Uma concepção liberal-igualitária de justiça distributiva. Rev. bras. Ci. Soc. [online]. 1999, vol.14, n.39, pp.41-59.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rodrigo Badaró Carvalho
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors keep the copyrights and allow the journal the right of first publishing, having the paper simultaneously licensed by Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the article – copyright recognized - and first publishing in this journal.
2. The journal is allowed to require the copyrights transfer, allowing the article to be used under noncommercial purposes, including the right to send the paper to Free Access or Paid databanks, not assuming the obligation to pass on the value charged from users to the authors.
3. Authors are allowed to take additional contracts separately for nonexclusive distribution of the paper’s version published in this journal (e.g. publishing in institutional repository or as book chapter), recognizing the copyright and first publishing in this journal.