Notes on the concept of human essence in Marxism and Anthropology, by György Márkus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236672536018Keywords:
Human essence, Philosophical anthropologie, Ontology of Social BeingAbstract
First book written by György Márkus (1934-2016) aiming the international public, Marxism and Anthropology: the concept of 'human essence' in Marx's philosophy is an unavoidable reference in the Marxist debate on the subject. In this article I place the text of Márkus in the production of the Budapest School, a group of intellectuals organized around György Lukács throughout the 1960s, exploring their relation with the reflection of the mature Lukács, and through the elements mobilized from this reflection I present a critical review of Marxism and Anthropology. As main conclusions, I highlight the concept of the mobile substance underlying the characterization of human essence present in both authors, besides the fact that the extrapolation of the developmental tendencies of the social being typified by Lukács lead to the characterization of the human being as a natural, social, consciously and tendentially proposed by Márkus. So I hope to contribute for advancing a proper understanding of the relationship between the work of Marcus and the Budapest School, mapping the echoes of the influence of his mentor Lukacs.Downloads
References
ALTHUSSER, L. Por Marx. Campinas: Editora Unicamp, 2015.
BONENTE, B, I. Desenvolvimento em Marx e na teoria econômica:por uma crítica negativa do desenvolvimento capitalista.Niterói: Editora Eduff, 2016.
BROWN, D. N. Towards a radical democracy: the political economy of the Budapest School. Oxon: Routledge, 2011.
COUTINHO, C. N. Prefácio à edição brasileira. In: MARKUS, G. Te or ia do conhecimento no jovem Marx. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1974, p. 9 -16.
DUAYER, M; MEDEIROS, J. L. A Ontologia crítica de Lukács: para uma ética objetivamente fundada. In: MIRANDA, F. MONFARDINI, R (O rg.) Coleção NIEP-Marx – Volume II. Ontologia e Estética. Rio de Janeiro: Consequência, 2015, p. 17-46.
FROMM, E.O Conceito Marxista de Homem. 2ª Edição. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1962.
HELLER, A et al. Notes on Lukács Ontology. Télos, Vol. 29, p. 160-181, set., 1976.
JAFFE, A. The critical value of György Márkus’s philosophical anthropology:Rereading Marxism and Anthropology: The concept of human essence in the philosophy of Marx. Thesis Eleven, Vol. 126:1, p. 38-51, fev.-abr., 2015.
MARKUS, G. Marxismo e Antropologia: o conceito de “essência humana” na filosofia de Marx. São Paulo: Expressão Popular, 2015.
______. Teoria do conhecimento no jovem Marx. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Te r r a , 19 74.
MARX, K. Cadernos de Paris e Manuscritos Econômicos Filosóficos. São Paulo: Expressão Popular, 2015.
______. Grundrisse. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2011.
______. O Capital – Livro I: O processo de produção do capital.São Paulo: Boitempo, 2013.
MARX, K. ENGELS, F. Ideologia Alemã. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2007.
LUKÁCS, G. História e Consciência de Classe: estudos sobre a dialética marxista. 2ª Edição. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2012a.
______. Estetica. Barcelona: Grijalbo, 1965.
______. Autocrítica do Marxismo: entrevista de György Lukács a Leandro Konder. Rio de Janeiro: Jornal do Brasil, 24-25 de Agosto, 1969. Disponível em: <https://marxismo21.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/A-autocritica-do-marxismo.pdf >. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2018.
______. Pensamento vivido: autobiografia em dialogo de György Lukács: entrevista a István Eórsi e Ersébert Vezér. São Paulo: Estudos e Edições Ad Hominem; Viçosa, MG: Editora da UFV, 1999.
______. As bases ontológicas do pensamento e da atividade do homem. In: O Jovem Marx e outros escritos de filosofia. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ, 2009, p. 225-246.
______.The Development of the Budapest School. The Times Literary Supplement. Nº 3615 (June 11, 1971).
______.Para uma ontologia do ser social –Volume I.São Paulo: Boitempo, 2012b.
______.Para uma ontologia do ser social –Volume II.São Paulo: Boitempo, 2013.
______. Prolegômenos para uma ontologia do ser social. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2014.
OLDRINI, G. As origens da ontologia (marxista) de Lukács. In: LUKÁCS, G. Para uma ontologia do ser social – Volume II.São Paulo: Boitempo, 2013, p. 9-38.
PICKLE, J. RUNDEL, J. Introduction:the Budapest School and its legacies: migration, modernity, philosophy. In: PICKLE, J. RUNDEL, J. (O rg.). Critical Theories and the Budapest School: politics, culture, modernity. London: Routledge, 2018, p. 1-12.
REDDING, P. György Márkus https://www.humanities.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/AAH-OBIT-MARKUS-G-2016-1.pdf >. Acesso em: 8 abr. 2018.
SZELENYI, I. Notes on the “Budapest School”. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, Vol. 8:1, p. 61-67, jun-dez, 1977.
TOSEL, A. The late Lukács and the Budapest School. In: Bidet, J. Kouvelakis (Org.) Critical companion to contemporary marxism.Leiden: Brill, 2008, p. 163-174.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Século XXI – Revista de Ciências Sociais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors keep the copyrights and allow the journal the right of first publishing, having the paper simultaneously licensed by Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the article – copyright recognized - and first publishing in this journal.
2. The journal is allowed to require the copyrights transfer, allowing the article to be used under noncommercial purposes, including the right to send the paper to Free Access or Paid databanks, not assuming the obligation to pass on the value charged from users to the authors.
3. Authors are allowed to take additional contracts separately for nonexclusive distribution of the paper’s version published in this journal (e.g. publishing in institutional repository or as book chapter), recognizing the copyright and first publishing in this journal.