Crossed visualities. A case of inquiry about the images of experimental science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983734830724Keywords:
Visualities, Art, science and technology, Sensible distributionAbstract
This article involves some questions around the production of knowledge in Basic Psychology. By means of interviews and revision of images we work with a group of university researchers departing from the visualities produced in this field. The aim is to know how the use of the repertories of visual culture can tackle the contents of the arts, science and technologies to subvert the sensible distribution of the disciplinary division in which the systematic knowledge is organized.
Downloads
References
ANKER, Suzanne; Talasek, J.D. (Eds). Visual Culture and Bioscience. Baltimore: Center of Art, Design, and Visual Culture/University of Maryland-CPNAS, 2008.
FRAZZETTO, Giovanni; ANKER, Suzanne. Neuroculture. In: Nature, Volume 10, November, 2009, 815-821.
GAROIAN, Charles. The Prosthetic Pedagogy of Art. Embodied Research an Practice New York: State University of New York Press, 2013.
______________; Gaudelius, Yvonne, M. Spectacle Pedagogy. Art, Politics, and Visual Culture, 2008.
RANCIÈRE, Jacques. Sobre políticas estéticas Barcelona: MACBA, 2005.
_______________ . El desacuerdo. Política y Filosofía. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visón, 1996.
REICHLE, Ingeborg. Images in Art and Science and the Quest for a New Image Science. In: Leonardo, Volume 48, Number 1, 2015, pp. 74-75.
_____________ The Art of DNA. In: Dawn Leach, Slavko Kacunko (Org.) Image-Problem. Medienkunst und Performance im Kontext der Bilddiskussion, Logos Verlag Berlin 2007, p. 155–166.
______________ Where Art and Science Meet. Genetic Engineering in Contemporary Art In: kunst-texte.de, BildWissenTechnik, Nº 2, 2003.
SCHWAN, Alexander. Body-Calligraphies: Dance as an Embodied Fantasy of Writing. In: Anker, Suzanne; Flach, Sabine (Eds.) Embodied Fantasies: From Awe to Artifice. Bern: Peter Lang, 2013, pp. 217-227.
