Ecopatio – un camino para la sustentabilidad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083954Palabras clave:
Médio ambiente, Desenvolvimiento sustentable, Educación ambiental, Ecoalfabetización, Comunidad escolarResumen
Ese trabajo, empezó en abril de 2009, tuve por principal objetivo repensar el ambiente escolar de las escuelas municipales de Enseñanza Fundamental, localizadas en el sitio urbano de la ciudad de Araricá, en la región leste del estado del Rio Grande del Sur (Brasil). La selección de las escuelas que deberían componer la amostra fue realizada con el apoyo de la Escuela Ambiental “Espacios Semientes de la Vida” y de la Secretaria de Educación de la ciudad, a través de la evaluación de los proyectos presentados por las escuelas participantes del Concurso “Ecopatio”. La idea del proyecto era de que las instituciones de enseñanza repensasen el patio de la escuela, creando medios sustentables para redibujar el ambiente, bien como repensaren el termo “basura”, cambiando su uso. Las escuelas fueron valoradas por una delegación compuesta por distintos segmentos de la sociedad y que visitó el ambiente escolar para constatar la elaboración de las acciones propuestas. La metodología usada permitió la implantación de un proceso colectivo de producción y cambio de saberes, proporcionando una acción educativa interdisciplinar en todo la comunidad escolar, posibilitando la ecoalfabetización de alumnos, profesores y funcionarios.
ecopatio – un camino para la sustentabilidadDescargas
Citas
AGENDA 21. Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o meio ambiente e desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro, {S.Ed.} 1992, cap.36.
CAPRA, Fritjof. Alfabetização ecológica: a educação das crianças para um mundo sustentável. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006.
CARVALHO, I.C. As transformações na cultura e o debate ecológico: desafios políticos para a educação ambiental. In: Noal, F. REIGOTA, M.; BARCELOS, V. (org.) Tendências da Educação Ambiental Brasileira. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC, 1998.
CARVALHO, Isabel Cristina de Moura. Educação Ambiental: a formação do sujeito ecológico. São Paulo: Cortez, 2004.
CONAMA. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução n°. 10/93. Brasília: 1993.
FEDRIZZI, B. Paisagismo no pátio escolar. Porto Alegre: Editora da Universidade/ UFRGS, 1999.
GADOTTI, Moacir. Boniteza de um sonho: ensinar-e-aprender com sentido. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2003.
LEGAN, Lucia. A escola sustentável: eco-alfabetizando pelo ambiente. São Paulo: Imprensa Oficial do Estado de
São Paulo; Pirenópolis, GO: IPEC – Instituto de Permacultura e Ecovilas do Cerrado, 2004.
NUNES, Ellen Regina Mayhé. Alfabetização ecológica: um caminho para a sustentabilidade. Porto Alegre: Ed. Do
Autor, 2005.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
