Impacto ambiental derivado das ações de controle e combate à dengue no Rio Grande do Norte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085914Keywords:
Dengue, Insecticide, Environmental impactAbstract
The growing presence of the problems arising from the occurrence of dengue in Brazil has beenstrengthening the control elements to vectors that transmit this disease. However, little isobserved adherence environmental issues associated with the techniques used for combatingthese agents, especially when the use of chemical high severity to human health. Therefore, theobjective is to draw attention to a reality that is out of the media and public knowledge, basicelements for generating a process of deploying an environmental management system inzoonoses control structures. The methodology used to conduct the study was a literature reviewand application of the FMEA technique for identifying and prioritizing key environmental aspectsand impacts. The items identified were prioritized against its occurrence, frequency, severity, legalrequirements and associated control measures used. From the results it is important to highlightthe extent of the problem of environmental and public health, should be established a cycle ofcontinuous improvement to calculate the environmental damage caused by such activities.
Downloads
References
ANDRADE, M. R. S.; TURRIONE, J. B. Uma metodologia de análise dos aspectos e impactos ambientais através da utilização do FMEA. In: Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção/ ENEGEP, São Paulo: 2000.
APERJ, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: Dengue põe em evidência pesquisas realizada no Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: http://www.faperj.br/boletim_interna.phtml?obj_id=4424. Acesso: em 10 do abr. 2012.
BRASIL, Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica. Doenças infecciosas e parasitárias: Ministério da Saúde: 8.ed. Brasília. Ministério da Saúde. 2010.
CAMPANI, D. B. et al. A Gestão Ambiental da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. In: V Congreso de AIDIS-sección uruguaya, 2005.
CHIARAVALLOTI, F. et al. Controle do dengue em uma área urbana do Brasil: avaliação do impacto do Programa Saúde da Família com relação ao programa tradicional de controle. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 22(5): 987-997, mai, 2006.
DIARIO DE NATAL. Disponível em: http://www.donline.com.br. Acesso em: 20/06/2012.
DIGGLE, P. J. (1992). Time Series. A Biostatistical Introduction. In (Copas, J.B. et al., eds.): Oxford Statistical Science Series - 5. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford.
DONALÍSIO, M. R.; GLASSER, C. M. Vigilância entomológica e controle de vetores do dengue. Rev.Bras. Epidemiologia, v. 5, n. 3, p. 259-272, 2002.
FORATTINI, O. P. Ecologia epidemiologia e socidade.-2.ed.-São Paulo :Artes Médicas, p.35, 2004.
ISO. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management - the ISO 14000 family of international standards. 2002.
MEDRONHO, R. A. Dengue no Brasil: desafios para o seu controle. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 24(5): 948-949, mai, 2008.
MERCADANTE Jr, E. Dengue ameaça o Rio.Rio de Janeiro: Conselho Regional de Biologia 2a. região RJ/ES.
BIONOTÍCIAS, ano x, n° 7, jan/fev, p.5, 2006.
MONTEIRO, C. A. (Org) - Velhos e Novos males da saúde no Brasil: A evolução do país e suas doenças. São Paulo: HUCITEC, NUPENS/USP, - 2a ed., 2000.
MOREIRA, M. S. Estratégia e Implantação do Sistema de Gestão Ambiental (Modelo ISO1400). Editora DG.
NBR ISO 14001: Sistemas de Gestão Ambiental: especificações e diretrizes para uso. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro, 1996.
NOVATO, A. P. S. et al. Levantamento e priorização de oportunidades de produção mais limpa para os recursos hídricos em refinarias de petróleo. Trabalho final de curso, especialização em processamento de petróleo. Instituto de Química, UERJ/Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, 2006.
RUEDA, et al. (1990). Temperature Development and Survival Rates of Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti (Dipetera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 27 (5): 892 –898.
SILVA, E. L.; MENEZES, E. M. Metodologia da pesquisa e elaboração da dissertação. 3º ed. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC: Florianópolis, 2001.
SANTOS, R. S. Fatores associados à ocorrência de formas imaturas de Aedes aegypti na Ilha do Governador, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Uberaba: Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, vol.32, n.°4, Jul/Ago, 1999.
TEIXEIRA, M. G. et al. Avaliação de impacto de ações de combate ao Aedes aegypti na cidade de Salvador, Bahia. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. Vol. 5, Nº 1, 2002.
YANG, H. M et al. The Serorevertion and The Survival Related to HIV Infection Among Children: Statistical Modeling Applied to Retrospective Data Collection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling: Estados Unidos: ,v.38, p.251 - 267, 2003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
