Vivências e Significações Socioambientais do Projeto Horto Municipal de Faxinal do Soturno/RS

Authors

  • Juliana Andreola Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS
  • Jumaida Rosito Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084635

Keywords:

Municipal Garden Project, Environmental Education, Environmental Awareness, Social and Environmental Practices

Abstract

This research was developed in the context of Integral Attention to Children and Adolescents'Program, in Faxinal Soturno/RS' Garden. This social program receives children and adolescents ofthe city, which are in a social vulnerability situation. The objective of this study was to examine ifthe program contributes to the awakening of environmental awareness among children andadolescents, and, moreover, it sought to know the meaning of the social interactionbetweenyoungs in the the Garden's Project. For this, in this research was used the technique of fieldexploratory and included the qualitative analysis through the use of questionnaires, those wassent to families and reports obtained with youth those are participante of the project, that relatetheirs experiences in the Garden. The results shows that the Project of the Garden is perceived asan environment for socialization, interaction, construction of learning, and fundamentallystimulator of values that they are connect with the environmental preservationists practices. Withthis, it can be said that the project reach your main objectives and the same time it contributes tothe formation of citizens aware of their actions with the environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

COLL, César. Aprendizagem Escolar e Construção do Conhecimento. Trad. Emília de Oliveira Dihel. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1994.

DÍAZ, Alberto P. Educação Ambiental como projeto.Fátima Murad (trad.), 2ª ed., Porto Alegre: artmed, 2002.

GUIMARÃES, Mauro. A dimensão ambiental na educação. 8ª ed, São Paulo: Papirus, 1995, (Coleção; magistério formação e trabalho).

LAKATOS, Eva Maria; MARCONI, Marina de Andrade. Fundamentos da metodologia científica. 6 ed, São Paulo:Atlas, 2007.

LOUREIRO, Carlos; B., LAYRARGUES; Philippe P., CASTRO; Ronaldo S.. Sociedade e Meio Ambiente: a educação ambiental em debate. (orgs). São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.

MORIN, Edgar. Os sete saberes necessários à educação do futuro; (tradução de Catarina Eleonora F. da Silva e Jeanne Sawaya ; revisão técnica de Edgard de Assis Carvalho), 2. ed., São Paulo: Cortez; Brasília, DF: UNESCO, 2000.

PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE FAXINAL DO SOTURNO/RS. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente e da Agricultura. Regimento Interno do Horto Municipal. Faxinal do Soturno, 2005.

TRIGUEIRO, André. Meio Ambiente no século 21: 21 especialistas falam da questão ambiental nas suas áreas do conhecimento. (Autores associados), 5ª ed.,Campinas, São Paulo:Armazén do Ipê, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-12

How to Cite

Andreola, J., & Rosito, J. (2012). Vivências e Significações Socioambientais do Projeto Horto Municipal de Faxinal do Soturno/RS. Monografias Ambientais, 6(6), 1298–1304. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084635

Issue

REMOA, V. 6, N. 6, MAR., 2012

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.