Percepções da importância de reciclagem nos laboratórios da Fepagro/sede (Fundação Estadual de Pesquisa Agropecuária)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084276Keywords:
Reuse, Preservation, InterviewAbstract
Recycling is a process in which certain types of materials, routinely recognized as garbage arereused as raw material for manufacturing new products. In addition to present with differentphysical properties, they also feature a new composition, which is the main factor that differs fromthe reuse of recycling, these concepts are often confused. This process is important today,because it turns what would or already in the garbage into new products, reducing waste thatwould be launched in nature, while saving raw materials, often from non-renewable resources andenergy (Araguaia, 2011). The research conducted through qualitative interview addressed to members of the laboratories of FEPAGRO / Headquarters, located in the city of Porto Alegre / RS,obtained as a result, when asked if there was some kind of recycling, 50% said yes, citing that asrecycling consists of disposable and recyclable waste, reuse of glass and plastic packaging andcardboard dry waste separation and organic, and the incorporation of the prepared solutions andmeans on disposal of organic waste for composting. And when asked about recycling all said theywere in favor, however, as to why it was noticed at the same time a diversity and similarities in theresponses regarding the perceived importance of recycling and these are: the preservation andprotection of health and environment, thus decreasing pollution and water contamination, soiland air, preservation of renewable and nonrenewable resources in addition to the wealth ofeconomic power of the institution and for the production of new packaging and improved the livesof individuals. Based on research conducted it is clear that respondents are sensitive enough tojust adopt a recycling program within the institution.
Downloads
References
ARAGUAIA, M. Reciclagem. Disponível em: http://www.brasilescola.com/biologia/reciclagem.htm.Acesso
em: 16 agost. 2011
CBS Previdência. COLETA SELETIVA DE LIXO. Disponível em: http://www.cbsprev.com.br/web/images/Coleta_Seletiva_de_lixo.pdf. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2011.
CIBio (Comissão de Biossegurança), Instituto de Químca da Unicamp, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.cibio-iq.iqm.unicamp.br/regras.html. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2011.
JARDIM, W.F. Gerenciamento de resíduos químicos em laboratórios de ensino e pesquisa. Química Nova, v.21, n.5, São Paulo, 1998, p.671-673.
LEAL, A.C.; GONÇALVES, M.A.; JUNIOR, A.T. A reinserção do lixo na sociedade do capital: Uma contribuição ao entendimento do trabalho na catação e na reciclagem. In: JUNIOR, A.T.(Ed.) Dinâmica geográfica do trabalho do século XXI (Limites explicativos, autocrítica e desafios teóricos). Presidente Prudente, 2009, p. 143-156.
SCHWAMBACH, K.H. Utilização de plantas medicinais e medicamentos no autocuidado no município de
Teutônia, RS. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 2007, 98p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
