Environmental awareness: social understanding of soil resource by a group of students from Special School Antônio Francisco Lisboa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130842031Keywords:
Environmental education, Soils, InclusionAbstract
Anthropic actions have altered the properties of the soil and its compositions causing imbalance and threatening the existence of different life forms,since the soil has different balance – keeping functions on the planet and we all have a right to environmental education,the concern arises in sharing this theme in specialized care institutions.This work sought to share information about the soil and nature with the students of the School Special Antônio Francisco Lisboa (Santa Maria, RS) in order to demonstrate the interest of the students, we propose workshops, with different situations, were presented the importance of environmental education, using soils. It was realized how important environmental education is important to include different people in the search for the care of oneself, of the other, of the soil, of nature.
Downloads
References
BOGDAN, R.; BIKLEN, S. Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Portugal: Porto Editora, 1994.
DONATO, Cida. ‘A teatralidade das danças populares brasileiras e suas possíveis releituras contemporâneas: a busca por uma pedagogia da afetividade’. Rio de Janeiro: ISERJ, 2012.
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
LAZCANO, C.; DOMÍNGUEZ, J. The use of vermicompost in sustainable agriculture: impact on plant growth and soil fertility. In: MIRANSARI, M.(Ed.).Soil nutrients. New York: Nova Science Publishers,2011. p.230-254.
MUGGLER, C. C., PINTO, F. de A.; MACHADO, A. A. Educação em solos:princípios, teoria e métodos. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. v. 30, p.733-740, 2006.
OLIVEIRA, S. de F. VIANA, R. M. e PEREIRA, M. V. Educação Ambiental:pertencer e cuidar da teia da vida. Mercator – Revista de Geografia da UFC.Ano 7. n. 13. Goiânia, 2008. p. 39-46.
VALLADARES, Licia. Os dez mandamentos da observação participante.Disponivel em:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-69092007000100012. Acesso em : 5 de Março de 2018.
VYGOTSKY, L.S. Psicologia da Arte. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2004.
___________. A formação social da mente. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. 1999.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
