Projeto Sorrir Faz Bem: o voluntariado na vida acadêmica

Authors

  • Lauren Oliveira Lima Bohner Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC
  • Luiz Jarbas Godoy Filho Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC
  • Graziela de Luca Canto Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083327

Keywords:

Volunteering, Extension project

Abstract

Emaus house it is a private entity, philanthropyc and noneconomic purposes, that protects 6 to 18year old boys, in a risk situation. To those boys it is offered a house, food, school help, non-formaleducation, sports, cares of health and actions that leads to the child integral development. All thepersons who are connect to the Instituition dedicates their time voluntarily. To integrate theacademics to the Volunteer World, connecting them to the Community that they live, the PETOdonto – Fono Group makes the “Sorrir Faz Bem” Project, where they developed volunteeractivities with school help in Emaus` house. Besides providing homework help, the academicstudents shows the young boys the pleasure of studying, contributing with the self esteem rescue.On the other hand, this project it is a rich experience to the student, since it proposes the personaldevelopment, and fortification of their citizenship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Casa Lar”. Disponível em: http://www.casalaremaus.org.br. Acesso em: 20 de maio 2011.

BARDAGI, M.P.; ARTECHE, A.X.; NEIVA-SILVA, L. “Projetos sociais com adolescentes em situação de risco: Discutindo o

trabalho e a intervenção profissional como estratégias de intervenção”. Violência e risco na infância e adolescência: Pesquisa e intervenção, Casa do Psicólogo, p. 101-146, 2005.

CASTILHO, M.L.R.; CASTILHO, A.L. “A Universidade e os Projetos Sociais: Projeto Rondon – Cooperação entre a

universidade e comunidades do Estado do Mato Grosso/ MT”. Disponível em: http://www.estudosdotrabalho.org/anais6seminariodotrabalho/myrianluciaruizcastilhoeandreluizcastilho.pdf. Acesso em: 30 maio. 2011.

DE SOUZA, L.M.; LAUTERT L. “Trabalho voluntário: Uma alternativa para a promoção de saúde dos idosos” Rev. esc.

enferm. USP, v.42 (2), 2008.

FERREIRA, M.; PROENCA, T.; PROENCA, J.F. “As motivações no trabalho voluntário”. Rev. Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão, v. 7(3), p.43-53, 2008.

MENDES, V.R. “Atividades recreativas em uma Casa Lar: contribuições à formação universitária”. Motriz, Rio Claro, v.15(4), p.1014-1024, 2000.

Ministério da Saúde. “Violência faz mal à saúde”. Disponível em: http://dtr2001.saude.gov.br/editora/produtos/livros/pdf/06_0315_M.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de maio 2011.

PIRES, A.L.D.; MIYAZAKI, M.C.O.S. “Maus-tratos contra crianças e adolescentes: Revisão de literatura para profissionais da saúde”. Arq Ciênc Saúde ,12(1), p.42-49, 2005.

SARAIVA, J.L. “Papel da Extensão Universitária na formação de estudantes e professores”. Brasília Med , 44(3), 220-

, 2007.

SBERGA, A.A. “Voluntariado educativo”. Disponível em: http://www.educardpaschoal.org.br/web/upload/NossosLivros/72_livro_volunteducativo.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de maio 2011.

Downloads

Published

2011-07-11

How to Cite

Bohner, L. O. L., Godoy Filho, L. J., & Canto, G. de L. (2011). Projeto Sorrir Faz Bem: o voluntariado na vida acadêmica. Monografias Ambientais, 3(3), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083327

Issue

REMOA, V. 3, N. 3, JUL., 2011

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)