The solo as cross theme for interdisciplinary work in sixth year primary education

Authors

  • Franciéle Rodrigues Furlan Welter Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS
  • Berenice Soares Bueno Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820640

Keywords:

Textbook, Soil, Interdisciplinary, Curriculum, Elementary school

Abstract

Soil is one of the natural elements that are worked, for the most part, in isolation in Science discipline in the sixth grade of elementary school, however, the teachers of the High School State School Dr. José Sampaio Marques Luz, had the opportunity to find content that can serve as support to initiate a search path of building an integrated curriculum, able to promote interdisciplinarity and that is meaningful to the students. The interventional activity performed during the teaching day school, with the school teachers, aimed to trigger interdisciplinary dialogue among teachers of the same subject area for the production of an integrated offering of subjects. Teachers could create after dialogued lectures by area of knowledge, proposals for inter work, multilateral and multidisciplinary. The results showed that, there is certainly motivation on the part of educators involved in this work in dialogue and initiate a (re) construction of curriculum. However, it takes time available for such a transformation, involving study and dedication. Participants of interventional activity developed proposals starting from the proposed theme and set out to apply and to continue to study this methodology that seeks to unify knowledge and make them more meaningful to students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Franciéle Rodrigues Furlan Welter, Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

Especialista em Educação: Interdisciplinaridade e transversalidade pela Universidade Federal do Pampa. Graduada em Ciências Biológicas-Licenciatura Plena pela Universidade Federal do Pampa. 

Berenice Soares Bueno, Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

Possui habilitação para o magistério, docência em educação infantil e anos iniciais, graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Licenciatura Plena e especialização em Educação - Aspectos Legais e Metodológicos pela Universidade da Região da Campanha e especialização em Interdisciplinaridade e Transversalidade pela UNIPAMPA.

References

BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais Gerais da Educação Básica. Secretaria da Educação Básica. Secretaria de Educação Continuada, Alfabetização, Diversidade e Inclusão. Brasília: MEC, 2013.

BRASIL. Ministério da Educação e Cultura. Lei de Diretrizes e base da Educação Nacional – LDB. Centro de documentação do Congresso Nacional. Brasília, DF, 1996.

BRASIL. MEC. CNE. Parecer nº 15 da Câmara de Educação Básica. Brasília, 1998.

BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: Ciências Naturais. Brasília: MEC /SEF, 1998.

FAZENDA, Ivani C. A. (Org.) Interdisciplinaridade: História, teoria e pesquisa. 11.ed. São Paulo: [s.e.], 2003.

FAZENDA. Didática e interdisciplinaridade. Campinas: Papirus, 1998.

FERREIRA; Nali Rosa Silva. Currículo: espaço interdisciplinar de experiências formadoras do professor da escola de educação básica. Publicação Oficial do GEPI - Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Interdisciplinaridade – Educação/Currículo – Linha de Pesquisa: Interdisciplinaridade: PUC/SP. R. Interd., São Paulo, Volume 1, número 0, p.01-83. Out, 2010.

FRACALANZA, Hilário; MEGID Neto, Jorge. O livro didático de ciências: problemas e soluções. Ciência & Educação, v. 9, n. 2, p. 147-157, 2003.

FOUREZ, Gérard. MAINGAIN, Alain. DUFOUR, Barbara. Abordagens didácticas da interdisciplinaridade. Título Original: Approches didactiques de l’interdisciplinarité. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 2002.

LENOIR, Y. Didática e interdisciplinaridade: uma complementaridade necessária e incontestável. In: FAZENDA, I. (org.) Didática e interdisciplinaridade. São Paulo: Papirus, 1998.

LÜCK, Heloísa. Pedagogia Interdisciplinar: fundamentos teóricos metodológicos. 17. ed. Petrópolis/RJ: Vozes, 2010.

PLANO NACIONAL DO LIVRO DIDÁTICO/2015, disponível em: http://www.fnde.gov.br/ programas/livro-didatico/livro-didatico-editais/item/4032-pnld-2015. Acesso em 31/05/2015 às 15h 34min.

PLANO NACIONAL DO LIVRO DIDÁTICO/ 2015 Histórico, disponível em: http://www.fnde.gov.br/ programas/livro-didatico/livro-didatico-historico. Acesso em 05/06/2015 às 19h 59min.

SPIASSI; Ariane. Análise de livros didáticos de ciências: um estudo de caso. Revista Trama - Volume 4 - Número 7 - 1º Semestre de 2008 – p. 45 – 54.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-07

How to Cite

Welter, F. R. F., & Bueno, B. S. (2015). The solo as cross theme for interdisciplinary work in sixth year primary education. Monografias Ambientais, 14, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820640

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO: INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E TRANSVERSALIDADE – UNIPAMPA – CAMPUS DE SÃO GABRIEL – RS

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.