The environmental education and the sacred ritual of the cururu of Mato Grosso
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820462Keywords:
Cururu, Environmental educationAbstract
The Mato Grosso Cururu shows the relationships between people and institutions. Therefore presents a world view. The New Rhetoric is the way which this paper wants to make visible through literature, research, custons and practices, which here also represent Environmental Education in order to understand it as an action that will form more critical and engaged individuals to the perception of an interdisciplinary subject. Going beyond the misconception that Environmental Education is restricted to, for example, ecology, think the discipline in the objectives of environmental education:awareness; behavior (attitude);competence; evaluation capacity;participation. Based on these objectives, this article thinks the rites as a mediators between the meeting of the man and the sacred, combat between reason and affection. The sacred rite of Mato Grosso Cururu propagates regional values and lets you see, in verse, music and performance, the relationship between ethos, logos and pathos to externalize the feelings emanating from the way of living in the Midwest. The New Rhetoric is the theoretical support, and in bibliographic search, the passions are unveiled by the verse, set design and music - the tune: arguments for the construction of epideictic genre.Downloads
References
Arruda, A. O rito sagrado do Cururu em Mato Grosso-Dimensão educativa, Cuiabá, 2007,[Dissertação de Mestrado, UNIC]
Azevedo, L. F. Paixões em Manuel de Barros: a importância de ser pantaneiro, Cuiabá: Carlini&Caniato, 2008.
Barilli, R. Retórica. Lisboa: Editorial Presença, 1979.
Campos, G. Pequeno dicionário de arte poética. EditoraCultrix, 1978.
Charaudeau, P. Grammaire du Senset de l’Expression. Paris: Hachette, 1992.
Dias, P. R. C.,Ritos e Rituais - Vida, Morte e Marcas Corporais: A Importância Desses Símbolos Para a Sociedade RitesAndRituals – Life, Death, Body Pat Terns: TheseSymbolsAndTheirImportance For SocietyVIDYA, v. 29, n. 2, p. 71-86, jul./dez., 2009 - Santa Maria, 2010. ISSN 2176-4603
Durand,G. As estruturas antropológicas do imaginário. Lisboa:EditorialPresença, 1989.
Durkhein, E. ;Rodrigues, J. A. Sociologia, 2a.ed., São Paulo : Ática, 1984.
Eggs, E.Ethosaristotélicien, conviction et pragmatiquemoderne, In:Amossy, R.(org.) Images de soidanslediscours. Paris: Niestlé, 1999. p. 31-49.
Ferreira, L. A. Atos retóricos, terrorismo e mídia: o movimento das paixões.Revista da ANPOLL, São Paulo, n.14,2003.
Galinari, M. M. A Era Vargas no Pentagrama: dimensões políticodiscursivas do canto orfeônico de Villa-Lobos. 2007a. Tese (Doutorado em Lingüística) – Faculdade de Letras, UFMG, Belo Horizonte.
Kawahara, L. S. Currículos Festeiros de águas e outonos: Fenomenologia da Educação Ambiental Pós-crítica. UFMT, 2015. Tese de Doutoramento. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso.
Landowski, E. Eles, Nós e Eu: Regimes de Visibilidade. Revista de Comunicação e Linguagens, Espaço Público, p. 145-150, 1985.
Maingueneau, D.Genèses Du discours. Liège: Mardaga, 1984.
Nasser, N. O Ethos na Música Grega. In Boletim do CPA, Campinas, no. 4, jul/dez, 1997, p.241-54.
Passos, L. A ;Sato, M. Educação Ambiental: O Currículo nas Sendas da Fenomenologia Merleau-pontyana. In SAUVÉ, L; ORNELLA, I. et SATO, M. (Dir) Sujetschoisis em éducationrelative à l´environnement – D`une Amérique à l´autre. Montréal: EREUQAM,2002, Tome I: p. 129-135.
Perelman, C. ;Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. Tratado da Argumentação– A Nova Retórica. Tradução de Maria Ermantina Galvão. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.
Perelman, C. Retórica das paixões,São Paulo:Martins Fontes, 2000.
Perelman, C. Retórica. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda, 1998.
Rodolpho, M. Écfrase e Evidência nas Letras Latinas: Doutrina e Práxis. São Paulo: FFLCH-USP,2010, Dissertação de Mestrado.
Sorrentino, M. De Tbilisi a Tessaloniki, a educação ambiental no Brasil. In: JACOBI, P. et al. (orgs.). Educação, meio ambiente e cidadania: reflexões e experiências. São Paulo: SMA.1998. p.27-32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
